[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments - Recommendation 3 - Fundamental Bylaws
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
epilisse at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 07:03:26 UTC 2016
Chris,
Agreed.
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4
> On 24 Jan 2016, at 08:30, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au> wrote:
>
> El,
>
> I think whether it's the council or the members would depend on the internal rules of the SO.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
> .au Domain Administration Ltd
> T: +61 3 8341 4111 | F: +61 3 8341 4112
> E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: www.auda.org.au
>
> auDA - Australia's Domain Name Administrator
>
>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 17:28, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Eberhard,
>>
>>
>>>> In practice, does that mean ccNSO Council must pass a resolution or ccNSO Members must pass, as example for a SO?
>>
>> Yes - I would assume that the ccNSO would pass a resolution, and then forward a request for access to minutes or accounting records.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Tonkin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list