[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments - Recommendation 3 - Fundamental Bylaws

Dr Eberhard W Lisse epilisse at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 07:03:26 UTC 2016


Chris,

Agreed.


el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4

> On 24 Jan 2016, at 08:30, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au> wrote:
> 
> El,
> 
> I think whether it's the council or the members would depend on the internal rules of the SO.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Chris Disspain | Chief Executive Officer
> .au Domain Administration Ltd
> T: +61 3 8341 4111 | F: +61 3 8341 4112
> E: ceo at auda.org.au | W: www.auda.org.au
> 
> auDA - Australia's Domain Name Administrator
> 
>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 17:28, Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Eberhard,
>> 
>> 
>>>> In practice, does that mean ccNSO Council must pass a resolution or ccNSO Members must pass, as example for a SO?
>> 
>> Yes - I would assume that the ccNSO would pass a resolution, and then forward a request for access to minutes or accounting records.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Bruce Tonkin 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list