[CCWG-ACCT] The 60 percent solution

[Greg Shatan]

All,

I wanted to pluck this suggestion out of the email swamp.

Kavouss made an alternative proposal concerning another threshold between
Simple Majority and 2/3 -- the alternative threshold is 60%.

Speaking only for myself, this could be a simple but creative way out of
the current situation.  It is a literally a middle ground between the
current majority threshold and the previously proposed 2/3 threshold:

*Votes*

*Percentage*

*Result*

8/16

50%

No

9/16

56.25%

Yes, by majority

10/16

62.50%

Yes, if by 60%

11/16

68.75%

Yes, if by 2/3

This would require one more vote than the current threshold and one less
vote than the 2/3 threshold.  Win/win?

Greg

On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Co-Chairs
> Pls kindly confirm that you have received my last alternative proposal
> concerning another threshold between Simple Majority and 2/3. This
> alternative threshould is *60%*
> *There has been many cases considered with that level of threshold*
> *Pls confirm its recption and confirm actions to be taken before you go to
> poll*
> *Awaiting for your reply*
> *Kavouss *
>
>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160131/1a7f562f/attachment.html>