[CCWG-ACCT] premature jurisdiction debates

[Martin Boyle]

No:  for a ccTLD it simply assures itself that the instructions it has received are from the organisation entitled to give them.  If in doubt it can ask for documentation to show this.

It has no role in making that decision itself.

Martin


Martin Boyle

Sent from my iPhone

[cid:image001.jpg at 01D0FCF7.DEE0F1F0]

nominet.uk<http://nominet.uk/>    DD: +44 (0)1865 332251<tel:+44%20(0)1865%20332251>
Minerva House, Edmund Halley Road, Oxford, OX4 4DQ, United Kingdom


On 23 Jun 2016, at 17:43, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:

I don't think this is correct, Greg. ICANN is responsible for delegating TLDs to applicants. The criteria and procedures are different for ccTLDs than gTLDs but in both cases ICANN does more than passively update root zone records, it plays a role in deciding which party those root zone records point to.


The point is the powerlessness of ICANN to actually cause (rather than receive, verify and transmit) changes to the root.

_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160623/6cb09486/attachment.html>