[CCWG-ACCT] premature jurisdiction debates

[Nigel Roberts]

Parminde

If you believe that the law is largely political, then you are 
professing that you do not believe in the Rule of Law.

And that sets your views at odds with the multistakeholderism which most 
of us have been building for 20 years.

You do not have to be a lawyer to participate constructively, but you do 
have believe in rule by laws (rules), NOT rule by men (people).

Therefore ICANN needs to be in a jurisdiction which is under the rule of 
law, where access to remedies does not have high barriers political 
influence on the judiciary is at a minimum.

California's not where I suggested it be, back in 1998.

But it will do.


On 26/06/16 14:01, parminder wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday 26 June 2016 06:08 PM, parminder wrote:
>> Jordan
>>
>> You construct law as something fully technical when it actually is
>> basically political, that is the major difference between your
>> approach and mine.