[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Human Rights Transition Provision: Bylaws Section 27.3(a)

Niels ten Oever lists at nielstenoever.net
Mon May 2 08:40:00 UTC 2016


Hi Tijani,

But the chartering organizations are mentioned in the charter of the
CCWG, so am not sure if I understand your concern.

Best,

Niels

On 05/02/2016 10:22 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
> Hi Niels,
> 
> The last modification of the bylaws proposed by the lawyers didn’t make
> any reference to the chartering organizations approval while it is
> clearly mentioned in the CCWG last proposal ratified by the chartering
> organizations.
> 
> Have a nice day
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>              +216 52 385 114
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>> Le 2 mai 2016 à 09:11, Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
>> <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>> a écrit :
>>
>> Dear Tijani and Kavouss,
>>
>> Could you please indicate where the proposed text is not consistent with
>> the report? Concrete references would be helpful for me to better
>> understand your point.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/02/2016 09:38 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>>> Tijani +1
>>> I fully agree with Tijani
>>> People misuse the opportunity to make modifications that were not agreed
>>> during the lkast 16 months
>>> NO CHANGE NO MODIFICATIONS.
>>> During the WSIS I WILL tell everybody that there is no supervision nor
>>> control on what we have agreed and the people will make whatever change
>>> they wish without the agreements of the others
>>>
>>> KAVOUSS
>>>
>>> 2016-05-02 8:14 GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>>> <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>
>>> <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>>:
>>>
>>>    Mathieu and all,
>>>
>>>    The modification proposed doesn’t reflect the CCWG last proposal
>>>    approved by the chartering organization. I don’t think we are
>>>    allowed to write bylaws that are not the exact interpretation of the
>>>    approved document that had the CCWG consensus and the charting
>>>    organizations ratification.
>>>
>>>    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>    *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>>>    Executive Director
>>>    Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>>>    Phone: +216 98 330 114
>>>                +216 52 385 114
>>>    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>>    Le 2 mai 2016 à 04:23, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>>>> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
>>>>    <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>    Mathieu,
>>>>    Tks
>>>>    Pls NOTE MY SERIOUS OBJECTIONS to:
>>>>    1.NOT MENTIONING REFERNCE TO THE APPROVAL OF CHARTERING
>>>>    ORGANIZATIONBS in HR
>>>>    2. GIVE GIVE A BLANKET AGREEMENT TO THE DOCUMENTS WHICH YET TO BE
>>>>    DRAFTED.
>>>>    3. Making so many changes to the Third proposals . We must avoid
>>>>    having a new proposal
>>>>    Kavouss
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    2016-05-01 22:42 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>>>> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>>>>    <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>:
>>>>
>>>>        Dear colleagues, 
>>>>
>>>>        Please find below for your consideration some suggestions from
>>>>        our lawyers for clarification of the bylaw language regarding
>>>>        the Human rights FoI. This follows our request during the
>>>>        previous call. 
>>>>
>>>>        Best,
>>>>
>>>>        Mathieu Weill
>>>>        ---------------
>>>>        Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style
>>>>
>>>>        Début du message transféré :
>>>>
>>>>>        *Expéditeur:* "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com
>>>>> <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
>>>>>        <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>>
>>>>>        *Date:* 1 mai 2016 19:10:53 UTC+2
>>>>>        *Destinataire:* "'Mathieu Weill'" <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>>>>> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>>>>>        <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>, "'Thomas Rickert'"
>>>>>        <thomas at rickert.net
>>>>> <mailto:thomas at rickert.net> <mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>, León Felipe
>>>>>        Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
>>>>> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
>>>>>        <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>, "bylaws-coord at icann.org
>>>>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>
>>>>>        <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>" <bylaws-coord at icann.org
>>>>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>
>>>>>        <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>>
>>>>>        *Cc:* ACCT-Staff <acct-staff at icann.org
>>>>> <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>
>>>>>        <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>>, "Rosemary E. Fei"
>>>>>        <rfei at adlercolvin.com
>>>>> <mailto:rfei at adlercolvin.com> <mailto:rfei at adlercolvin.com>>,
>>>>>        "ICANN at adlercolvin.com
>>>>> <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com> <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>"
>>>>>        <ICANN at adlercolvin.com
>>>>> <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com> <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>>,
>>>>>        Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com
>>>>> <mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>
>>>>>        <mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>>,
>>>>>        "Samantha.Eisner at icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>
>>>>>        <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>"
>>>>>        <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
>>>>> <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org> <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>>
>>>>>        *Objet:* *Human Rights Transition Provision:  Bylaws Section
>>>>>        27.3(a)*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        Dear Co-Chairs and Bylaws Coordinating Group: 
>>>>>
>>>>>        On the CCWG call last week, there was a discussion of the
>>>>>        Bylaws language regarding the transition provision on Human
>>>>>        Rights*//*[27.3(a)] and it was suggested that the language be
>>>>>        clarified to ensure that the same approval process used for
>>>>>        Work Stream 1 would apply.  We propose the following
>>>>>        clarifying edits.  We suggest that you share this with the
>>>>>        CCWG and if there is agreement, the following proposed edit
>>>>>        should be included in the CCWG’s public comment:____
>>>>>
>>>>>        Redline:____
>>>>>
>>>>>        *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
>>>>>        have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
>>>>>        interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is approved by
>>>>>        (i) approved for submission to the Board by the
>>>>>        CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work
>>>>>        Stream 2, and (ii) approved by each of the
>>>>>        CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii) the
>>>>>        Board, (in each thecase of the Board, using the same process
>>>>>        and criteria used by the Boardto consider the as for Work
>>>>>        Stream 1 Recommendations).____
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
>>>>>        reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
>>>>>        independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
>>>>>        solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
>>>>>        Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
>>>>>        by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
>>>>>        or the Board that occurred prior to the____
>>>>>
>>>>>        effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
>>>>>
>>>>>        Clean:____
>>>>>
>>>>>        *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
>>>>>        have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
>>>>>        interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is (i) approved
>>>>>        for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a
>>>>>        consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 and (ii) approved
>>>>>        by the Board, in each case, using the same process and
>>>>>        criteria as for Work Stream 1 Recommendations.____
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
>>>>>        reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
>>>>>        independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
>>>>>        solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
>>>>>        Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
>>>>>        by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
>>>>>        or the Board that occurred prior to the____
>>>>>
>>>>>        effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
>>>>>
>>>>>        Kind regards, ____
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        Holly and Rosemary____
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>        *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY*
>>>>>        Partner and Co-Chair
>>>>>        Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group____
>>>>>
>>>>>        *Sidley Austin LLP*
>>>>>        787 Seventh Avenue
>>>>>        New York, NY 10019
>>>>>        +1 212 839 5853
>>>>>        holly.gregory at sidley.com
>>>>> <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com> <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
>>>>>        www.sidley.com
>>>>> <http://www.sidley.com/> <http://www.sidley.com/>____
>>>>>
>>>>>        http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png
>>>>>        <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*____
>>>>>
>>>>>        __ __
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>>        This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information
>>>>>        that is privileged or confidential.
>>>>>        If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
>>>>>        e-mail and any attachments and notify us
>>>>>        immediately.
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>> ****************************************************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        _______________________________________________
>>>>        Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>        Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>        <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>        https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>>>    Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>    <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>>>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org/>
>>
>> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list