[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: Human Rights Transition Provision: Bylaws Section 27.3(a)
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Mon May 2 08:46:24 UTC 2016
Dear All,
The drafted bylaws MUST be consistent word by word to the text of the
Supplemental CCWG Proposal .Example text on Human Rights
Regards
Kavouss
2016-05-02 10:11 GMT+02:00 Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>:
> Dear Tijani and Kavouss,
>
> Could you please indicate where the proposed text is not consistent with
> the report? Concrete references would be helpful for me to better
> understand your point.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Niels
>
>
>
> On 05/02/2016 09:38 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> > Tijani +1
> > I fully agree with Tijani
> > People misuse the opportunity to make modifications that were not agreed
> > during the lkast 16 months
> > NO CHANGE NO MODIFICATIONS.
> > During the WSIS I WILL tell everybody that there is no supervision nor
> > control on what we have agreed and the people will make whatever change
> > they wish without the agreements of the others
> >
> > KAVOUSS
> >
> > 2016-05-02 8:14 GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
> > <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>>:
> >
> > Mathieu and all,
> >
> > The modification proposed doesn’t reflect the CCWG last proposal
> > approved by the chartering organization. I don’t think we are
> > allowed to write bylaws that are not the exact interpretation of the
> > approved document that had the CCWG consensus and the charting
> > organizations ratification.
> >
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> > Executive Director
> > Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> > Phone: +216 98 330 114
> > +216 52 385 114
> >
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >> Le 2 mai 2016 à 04:23, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> >> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> a écrit :
> >>
> >> Mathieu,
> >> Tks
> >> Pls NOTE MY SERIOUS OBJECTIONS to:
> >> 1.NOT MENTIONING REFERNCE TO THE APPROVAL OF CHARTERING
> >> ORGANIZATIONBS in HR
> >> 2. GIVE GIVE A BLANKET AGREEMENT TO THE DOCUMENTS WHICH YET TO BE
> >> DRAFTED.
> >> 3. Making so many changes to the Third proposals . We must avoid
> >> having a new proposal
> >> Kavouss
> >>
> >>
> >> 2016-05-01 22:42 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> >> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>:
> >>
> >> Dear colleagues,
> >>
> >> Please find below for your consideration some suggestions from
> >> our lawyers for clarification of the bylaw language regarding
> >> the Human rights FoI. This follows our request during the
> >> previous call.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Mathieu Weill
> >> ---------------
> >> Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style
> >>
> >> Début du message transféré :
> >>
> >>> *Expéditeur:* "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com
> >>> <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>>
> >>> *Date:* 1 mai 2016 19:10:53 UTC+2
> >>> *Destinataire:* "'Mathieu Weill'" <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
> >>> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>, "'Thomas Rickert'"
> >>> <thomas at rickert.net <mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>, León Felipe
> >>> Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
> >>> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>, "bylaws-coord at icann.org
> >>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>" <bylaws-coord at icann.org
> >>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>>
> >>> *Cc:* ACCT-Staff <acct-staff at icann.org
> >>> <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>>, "Rosemary E. Fei"
> >>> <rfei at adlercolvin.com <mailto:rfei at adlercolvin.com>>,
> >>> "ICANN at adlercolvin.com <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>"
> >>> <ICANN at adlercolvin.com <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>>,
> >>> Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com
> >>> <mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>>,
> >>> "Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
> >>> <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>"
> >>> <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>>
> >>> *Objet:* *Human Rights Transition Provision: Bylaws Section
> >>> 27.3(a)*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Dear Co-Chairs and Bylaws Coordinating Group:
> >>>
> >>> On the CCWG call last week, there was a discussion of the
> >>> Bylaws language regarding the transition provision on Human
> >>> Rights*//*[27.3(a)] and it was suggested that the language be
> >>> clarified to ensure that the same approval process used for
> >>> Work Stream 1 would apply. We propose the following
> >>> clarifying edits. We suggest that you share this with the
> >>> CCWG and if there is agreement, the following proposed edit
> >>> should be included in the CCWG’s public comment:____
> >>>
> >>> Redline:____
> >>>
> >>> *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
> >>> have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
> >>> interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is approved by
> >>> (i) approved for submission to the Board by the
> >>> CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work
> >>> Stream 2, and (ii) approved by each of the
> >>> CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii) the
> >>> Board, (in each thecase of the Board, using the same process
> >>> and criteria used by the Boardto consider the as for Work
> >>> Stream 1 Recommendations).____
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
> >>> reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
> >>> independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
> >>> solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
> >>> Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
> >>> by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
> >>> or the Board that occurred prior to the____
> >>>
> >>> effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
> >>>
> >>> Clean:____
> >>>
> >>> *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
> >>> have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
> >>> interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is (i) approved
> >>> for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a
> >>> consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 and (ii) approved
> >>> by the Board, in each case, using the same process and
> >>> criteria as for Work Stream 1 Recommendations.____
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
> >>> reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
> >>> independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
> >>> solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
> >>> Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
> >>> by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
> >>> or the Board that occurred prior to the____
> >>>
> >>> effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards, ____
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> Holly and Rosemary____
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>> *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY*
> >>> Partner and Co-Chair
> >>> Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice
> Group____
> >>>
> >>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
> >>> 787 Seventh Avenue
> >>> New York, NY 10019
> >>> +1 212 839 5853
> >>> holly.gregory at sidley.com <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
> >>> www.sidley.com <http://www.sidley.com/>____
> >>>
> >>> http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png
> >>> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*____
> >>>
> >>> __ __
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> >>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information
> >>> that is privileged or confidential.
> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
> >>> e-mail and any attachments and notify us
> >>> immediately.
> >>>
> >>>
> ****************************************************************************************************
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> >>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> >> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> >>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> >
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160502/424c8a32/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list