[CCWG-ACCT] Human Rights Transition Provision: Bylaws Section 27.3(a)
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Mon May 2 12:39:57 UTC 2016
Tijani +1
Kavouss
2016-05-02 14:34 GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>:
> Niels and Tatiana,
>
> I agreed with your complaint against the bylaws text proposed the first
> time because it didn’t reflect exactly the spirit of the CCWG final
> proposal ratified by the Chartering organizations. The correction made does
> not reflect the CCWG final proposal either. You said it is implicit; why we
> do not explicit it for clarity? Also this proposed bylaws text says " ...in
> each case, using the same process and criteria as for Work Stream 1
> Recommendations ». Those cases are:
>
> - approved for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a
> consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2
> - approved by the Board
>
>
> So for the approval by the CCWG and the approval by the board, the same
> process and criteria as for WS 1 recommendations will be used.
>
> You see that this process and those criteria will be used for the approval
> of CCWG and the Board. How this would imply the ratification of the
> Chartering organization?
>
> I understand that the first proposal made the approval of all the
> chartering organizations necessary, The modification should keep the
> reference to the ratification of the chartering organizations and add "as
> defined in the CCWG charter".
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
> +216 52 385 114
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Le 2 mai 2016 à 09:49, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de> a écrit :
>
> This is fine and a good argument, but I guess the problem is that the
> draft bylaw on human rights was *not* word by word with the text of the
> bylaw introduced in the proposal on the first place. This is why we asked
> for a clarification.
> Best regards
> Tanya
>
> On 02/05/16 10:46, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> The drafted bylaws MUST be consistent word by word to the text of the
> Supplemental CCWG Proposal .Example text on Human Rights
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> 2016-05-02 10:11 GMT+02:00 Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>:
>
>> Dear Tijani and Kavouss,
>>
>> Could you please indicate where the proposed text is not consistent with
>> the report? Concrete references would be helpful for me to better
>> understand your point.
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/02/2016 09:38 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>> > Tijani +1
>> > I fully agree with Tijani
>> > People misuse the opportunity to make modifications that were not agreed
>> > during the lkast 16 months
>> > NO CHANGE NO MODIFICATIONS.
>> > During the WSIS I WILL tell everybody that there is no supervision nor
>> > control on what we have agreed and the people will make whatever change
>> > they wish without the agreements of the others
>> >
>> > KAVOUSS
>> >
>> > 2016-05-02 8:14 GMT+02:00 Tijani BEN JEMAA <
>> <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
>> > <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>>:
>> >
>> > Mathieu and all,
>> >
>> > The modification proposed doesn’t reflect the CCWG last proposal
>> > approved by the chartering organization. I don’t think we are
>> > allowed to write bylaws that are not the exact interpretation of the
>> > approved document that had the CCWG consensus and the charting
>> > organizations ratification.
>> >
>> >
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>> > Executive Director
>> > Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>> > Phone: +216 98 330 114
>> > +216 52 385 114
>> >
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >
>> >> Le 2 mai 2016 à 04:23, Kavouss Arasteh <
>> <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
>> >> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> Mathieu,
>> >> Tks
>> >> Pls NOTE MY SERIOUS OBJECTIONS to:
>> >> 1.NOT MENTIONING REFERNCE TO THE APPROVAL OF CHARTERING
>> >> ORGANIZATIONBS in HR
>> >> 2. GIVE GIVE A BLANKET AGREEMENT TO THE DOCUMENTS WHICH YET TO BE
>> >> DRAFTED.
>> >> 3. Making so many changes to the Third proposals . We must avoid
>> >> having a new proposal
>> >> Kavouss
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2016-05-01 22:42 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Weill <
>> <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>> >> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>:
>> >>
>> >> Dear colleagues,
>> >>
>> >> Please find below for your consideration some suggestions from
>> >> our lawyers for clarification of the bylaw language regarding
>> >> the Human rights FoI. This follows our request during the
>> >> previous call.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Mathieu Weill
>> >> ---------------
>> >> Depuis mon mobile, désolé pour le style
>> >>
>> >> Début du message transféré :
>> >>
>> >>> *Expéditeur:* "Gregory, Holly" <holly.gregory at sidley.com
>> >>> <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>>
>> >>> *Date:* 1 mai 2016 19:10:53 UTC+2
>> >>> *Destinataire:* "'Mathieu Weill'" < <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>
>> mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>> >>> <mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>, "'Thomas Rickert'"
>> >>> <thomas at rickert.net <mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>, León Felipe
>> >>> Sánchez Ambía < <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
>> >>> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>, "bylaws-coord at icann.org
>> >>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>" <bylaws-coord at icann.org
>> >>> <mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>>
>> >>> *Cc:* ACCT-Staff < <acct-staff at icann.org>acct-staff at icann.org
>> >>> <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>>, "Rosemary E. Fei"
>> >>> <rfei at adlercolvin.com <mailto:rfei at adlercolvin.com>>,
>> >>> "ICANN at adlercolvin.com <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>"
>> >>> <ICANN at adlercolvin.com <mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>>,
>> >>> Sidley ICANN CCWG < <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>
>> sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com
>> >>> <mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>>,
>> >>> "Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
>> >>> <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>"
>> >>> <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org <mailto:Samantha.Eisner at icann.org
>> >>
>> >>> *Objet:* *Human Rights Transition Provision: Bylaws Section
>> >>> 27.3(a)*
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Dear Co-Chairs and Bylaws Coordinating Group:
>> >>>
>> >>> On the CCWG call last week, there was a discussion of the
>> >>> Bylaws language regarding the transition provision on Human
>> >>> Rights*//*[27.3(a)] and it was suggested that the language be
>> >>> clarified to ensure that the same approval process used for
>> >>> Work Stream 1 would apply. We propose the following
>> >>> clarifying edits. We suggest that you share this with the
>> >>> CCWG and if there is agreement, the following proposed edit
>> >>> should be included in the CCWG’s public comment:____
>> >>>
>> >>> Redline:____
>> >>>
>> >>> *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
>> >>> have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
>> >>> interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is approved by
>> >>> (i) approved for submission to the Board by the
>> >>> CCWG-Accountability as a consensus recommendation in Work
>> >>> Stream 2, and (ii) approved by each of the
>> >>> CCWG-Accountability’s chartering organizations and (iii) the
>> >>> Board, (in each thecase of the Board, using the same process
>> >>> and criteria used by the Boardto consider the as for Work
>> >>> Stream 1 Recommendations).____
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
>> >>> reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
>> >>> independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
>> >>> solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
>> >>> Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
>> >>> by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
>> >>> or the Board that occurred prior to the____
>> >>>
>> >>> effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
>> >>>
>> >>> Clean:____
>> >>>
>> >>> *Section 27.3. HUMAN RIGHTS____*
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> (a) The Core Value set forth in Section 1.2(b)(viii) shall
>> >>> have no force or effect unless and until a framework of
>> >>> interpretation for human rights (“*FOI-HR*”) is (i) approved
>> >>> for submission to the Board by the CCWG-Accountability as a
>> >>> consensus recommendation in Work Stream 2 and (ii) approved
>> >>> by the Board, in each case, using the same process and
>> >>> criteria as for Work Stream 1 Recommendations.____
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> (b) No person or entity shall be entitled to invoke the
>> >>> reconsideration process provided in Section 4.2, or the
>> >>> independent review process provided in Section 4.3, based
>> >>> solely on the inclusion of the Core Value set forth in
>> >>> Section 1.2(b)(viii) (i) until after the FOI-HR contemplated
>> >>> by Section 27.3(a) is in place or (ii) for actions of ICANN
>> >>> or the Board that occurred prior to the____
>> >>>
>> >>> effectiveness of the FOI-HR.____
>> >>>
>> >>> Kind regards, ____
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> Holly and Rosemary____
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>> *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY*
>> >>> Partner and Co-Chair
>> >>> Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice
>> Group____
>> >>>
>> >>> *Sidley Austin LLP*
>> >>> 787 Seventh Avenue
>> >>> New York, NY 10019
>> >>> +1 212 839 5853
>> >>> holly.gregory at sidley.com <mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
>> >>> www.sidley.com < <http://www.sidley.com/>
>> http://www.sidley.com/>____
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png
>> >>> <http://www.sidley.com/> *SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP*____
>> >>>
>> >>> __ __
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> >>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information
>> >>> that is privileged or confidential.
>> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
>> >>> e-mail and any attachments and notify us
>> >>> immediately.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> ****************************************************************************************************
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> >> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> >>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> >> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> >> <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>> >>
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> > Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing listAccountability-Cross-Community at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160502/a1258944/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list