[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - V2.0 of comments on draft Bylaws - 24 hour Final Feedback by CCWG-Accountability

[Andrew Sullivan]

Hi,

I note this does not ask that 1.1(d)(ii) E not be removed.  I think
that's the 5 year plans.  How come that's ok to be grandfathered?
Note that it's not the 5 year plans that exist now, but the ones to be
adopted.  I don't think the CCWG or CWG asked to grandfather those any
more than they did the various outside agreements.  I heartily agree
with the point in the comments that "the implementation phase is not a
time to incorporate new provisions that were not in the
CCWG-Accountability Recommendations," and I think this is another
example of it.

Best regards,

A

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:53:37PM -0400, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
> All,
> 
> Please find attached V2.0 of the CCWG-Accountability comments to be
> submitted to the ICANN public consultation on the New Bylaws.
> 
> Modifications since V1.0 was circulated (There is no red-line comparison as
> too many things have changed. Rather we are providing a high level summary
> of changes here and are providing both versions V1.0 and 2.0 for ease of
> comparison):
> 
> 
>    - V1.0 items 9 and 10 have been removed following consideration of legal
>    counsel advice.
>       - 9. Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 1.4(b)
>       - 10. Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 2.2 (c) (i) (A)
>       - V2.0 new item 9 is  - Draft Bylaws Section 1.2(b)(viii) which was
>    in the initial comments but not included in V1.0
>    - V2.0 new items 10 to 14. These are a selection by the leadership from
>    the list of issues submitted by Alan Greenberg this past weekend
>       - 10. Draft Bylaws Section 7.12 (b)
>       - 11. Draft Bylaws Section 4.6(b)(ii)
>       -
> 
>       12. Draft Bylaws Section 7.4(d)
>       -
> 
>       13. Draft Bylaws Section 7.11(a)(i)(B)
>       -
> 
>       14. Draft Bylaws Annex D, Section 1.4(b)(i-ii)
>       - V2.0 New - Conclusion - short recap of Introduction
> 
> The Final Feedback period is only intended to provide the
> CCWG-Accountability participants the opportunity to confirm there are no
> significant issues or gaps in this version and is not intended as an
> opportunity to raise new issues.
> 
> The Feedback period will begin 20:00UTC today Wednesday May 11th and close
> 20:00UTC Thursday May 12th.
> 
> Please reply to the list using the Subject line of this message to
> facilitate identifying your input (or simply REPLY to this email).
> 
> The objective of the leadership is to finalize these and submit them before
> the weekend.
> 
> Documents attached.
> 
> Bernard Turcotte
> ICANN Staff Support for the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs - Mathieu Weill,
> Thomas Rickert, Leon Sanchez



> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs at anvilwalrusden.com