[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - V2.0 of comments on draft Bylaws - 24 hour Final Feedback by CCWG-Accountability

[Schaefer, Brett]

All,

I did not see a reference to my question about 1.1(d)(ii)(E). When did the CCWG decide that E (the Five-year Strategic Pan and the Five-year Operating Plan existing on 1 October 2016) should be grandfathered and exempt from RFR or IRP challenge? Failing to include (E) in comment 2 would imply CCWG support for grandfathering these plans and excluding them from IRP or RFR challenge.

Also, while I agree with the lawyers statement that the GAC carve-out would and should apply to approval actions as stated in 3.6(e), I do not see the harm in recommending that the bylaws confirm that fact in Annex D through the addition of “after accounting for any adjustments to the below as required by the GAC Carve-out pursuant to Section 3.6(e) of the Bylaws if the Approval Action Board Notice included a GAC Consensus Statement”, which would be consistent with existing text on rejection actions.

Best,

Brett



From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:54 PM
To: Accountability Cross Community
Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - V2.0 of comments on draft Bylaws - 24 hour Final Feedback by CCWG-Accountability

All,

Please find attached V2.0 of the CCWG-Accountability comments to be submitted to the ICANN public consultation on the New Bylaws.

Modifications since V1.0 was circulated (There is no red-line comparison as too many things have changed. Rather we are providing a high level summary of changes here and are providing both versions V1.0 and 2.0 for ease of comparison):


  *   V1.0 items 9 and 10 have been removed following consideration of legal counsel advice.

     *   9.         Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 1.4(b)
     *   10.       Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 2.2 (c) (i) (A)

  *   V2.0 new item 9 is  - Draft Bylaws Section 1.2(b)(viii) which was in the initial comments but not included in V1.0
  *   V2.0 new items 10 to 14. These are a selection by the leadership from the list of issues submitted by Alan Greenberg this past weekend

     *   10. Draft Bylaws Section 7.12 (b)
     *   11. Draft Bylaws Section 4.6(b)(ii)
     *   12. Draft Bylaws Section 7.4(d)
     *   13. Draft Bylaws Section 7.11(a)(i)(B)
     *   14. Draft Bylaws Annex D, Section 1.4(b)(i-ii)

  *   V2.0 New - Conclusion - short recap of Introduction
The Final Feedback period is only intended to provide the CCWG-Accountability participants the opportunity to confirm there are no significant issues or gaps in this version and is not intended as an opportunity to raise new issues.

The Feedback period will begin 20:00UTC today Wednesday May 11th and close 20:00UTC Thursday May 12th.

Please reply to the list using the Subject line of this message to facilitate identifying your input (or simply REPLY to this email).

The objective of the leadership is to finalize these and submit them before the weekend.

Documents attached.

Bernard Turcotte
ICANN Staff Support for the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs - Mathieu Weill, Thomas Rickert, Leon Sanchez



________________________________
Brett Schaefer
Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
The Heritage Foundation
214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
Washington, DC 20002
202-608-6097
heritage.org<http://heritage.org/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160511/7b488a4d/attachment-0001.html>