[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - V2.0 of comments on draft Bylaws - 24 hour Final Feedback by CCWG-Accountability

Wed May 11 20:23:33 UTC 2016

I agree with Brett on both points below.

Thanks,
Robin

> On May 11, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Schaefer, Brett <Brett.Schaefer at heritage.org> wrote:
> 
> All,
>  
> I did not see a reference to my question about 1.1(d)(ii)(E). When did the CCWG decide that E (the Five-year Strategic Pan and the Five-year Operating Plan existing on 1 October 2016) should be grandfathered and exempt from RFR or IRP challenge? Failing to include (E) in comment 2 would imply CCWG support for grandfathering these plans and excluding them from IRP or RFR challenge.
>  
> Also, while I agree with the lawyers statement that the GAC carve-out would and should apply to approval actions as stated in 3.6(e), I do not see the harm in recommending that the bylaws confirm that fact in Annex D through the addition of “after accounting for any adjustments to the below as required by the GAC Carve-out pursuant to Section 3.6(e) of the Bylaws if the Approval Action Board Notice included a GAC Consensus Statement”, which would be consistent with existing text on rejection actions.
>  
> Best,
>  
> Brett  
>  
>  
>  
> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Bernard Turcotte
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 2:54 PM
> To: Accountability Cross Community
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - V2.0 of comments on draft Bylaws - 24 hour Final Feedback by CCWG-Accountability
>  
> All,
>  
> Please find attached V2.0 of the CCWG-Accountability comments to be submitted to the ICANN public consultation on the New Bylaws.
>  
> Modifications since V1.0 was circulated (There is no red-line comparison as too many things have changed. Rather we are providing a high level summary of changes here and are providing both versions V1.0 and 2.0 for ease of comparison):
>  
> V1.0 items 9 and 10 have been removed following consideration of legal counsel advice.
> 9.         Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 1.4(b)
> 10.       Draft Bylaws Annex D Section 2.2 (c) (i) (A)
> V2.0 new item 9 is  - Draft Bylaws Section 1.2(b)(viii) which was in the initial comments but not included in V1.0
> V2.0 new items 10 to 14. These are a selection by the leadership from the list of issues submitted by Alan Greenberg this past weekend
> 10. Draft Bylaws Section 7.12 (b)
> 11. Draft Bylaws Section 4.6(b)(ii)
> 12. Draft Bylaws Section 7.4(d)
> 13. Draft Bylaws Section 7.11(a)(i)(B)
> 14. Draft Bylaws Annex D, Section 1.4(b)(i-ii)
> V2.0 New - Conclusion - short recap of Introduction
> The Final Feedback period is only intended to provide the CCWG-Accountability participants the opportunity to confirm there are no significant issues or gaps in this version and is not intended as an opportunity to raise new issues.
>  
> The Feedback period will begin 20:00UTC today Wednesday May 11th and close 20:00UTC Thursday May 12th.
>  
> Please reply to the list using the Subject line of this message to facilitate identifying your input (or simply REPLY to this email).
>  
> The objective of the leadership is to finalize these and submit them before the weekend.
>  
> Documents attached.
>  
> Bernard Turcotte
> ICANN Staff Support for the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs - Mathieu Weill, Thomas Rickert, Leon Sanchez
>  
>  
> 
> Brett Schaefer
> Jay Kingham Senior Research Fellow in International Regulatory Affairs
> Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy
> The Heritage Foundation
> 214 Massachusetts Avenue, NE
> Washington, DC 20002
> 202-608-6097
> heritage.org <http://heritage.org/>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160511/5329b4b3/attachment-0001.html>