[CCWG-ACCT] latest letter from Cruz et al FYI

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Sun May 22 16:18:38 UTC 2016


It's not a problem. I understood the intention.

The difference is that the DNS *WAS* invented, not discovered however.

And invention can certainly create property rights.

As -- in US and common-law countries -- a representation coupled with 
reliance thereupon.



On 22/05/16 16:16, Arasteh wrote:
> Dear All
> Sorry for inattention using " invented" I correct it to be " discovered"
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 22 May 2016, at 15:48, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
> <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>> I hesitate to comment on the letter sent but  looking at the messages
>> exchanged, I wish to briefly comment in an individual capacity ( A
>> CCWG participant only ) as follows
>> 1. The analysis made by the authors of the letter were made with some
>> degree of partiality and with lack of full understanding of the process .
>> 2. As for the issue of "DNS Property" the attention of the authors are
>> drawn to the fact that , DNS like  ORIBITAL/ SPECTRUM RESOURCES are
>> natural resources and does not belong to anybody. It can be used by
>> any applicant under certain Rule and procedure .Therefore there is no
>> ownership on DNS at all.
>> It is evident that the internet has been mostly initiated by and from
>> a given country but it does not mean that such country is the owner of
>> the DNS. While It belongs to no body, it belongs to everybody.
>> The inventor of the electromagnetic waves and the countries in which
>> the issue was developed has never ever claimed to be the owner of the
>> spectrum .
>> Kavouss
>>
>> 2016-05-22 13:35 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>>:
>>
>>     I'm content to discuss it here - I was merely offering to take the
>>     discussion aside in case it was seen as off-topic (which is isn't,
>>     IMO, that much).
>>
>>
>>
>>     On 22/05/16 11:36, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>>
>>         on Act.
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list