[CCWG-ACCT] [ianatransition] U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Full Hearing on 24 May 2016

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

It is a bit of a nuisance CCing lists others can't post to....

el

-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4

> On 25 May 2016, at 21:54, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
> 
> Andrew,
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 May 2016, at 21:29, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> The transition proposal is simply a proposal to eliminate a function that is unneeded and does no work.  
> [...]
> 
> Nothing in this is simple, and whether it is unneeded is open for debate. 
> 
> However when it suits ICANN it alleges that the function does work.
> 
>> 
>>> Why is it seen as "a little insulting"?
>> 
>> Because people all over the world have worked tirelessly over the past
>> several years to hammer out a detailed consensus that finely balances
>> a whole bunch of considerations, 
> [...]
> 
> The amount of work can not be used as rationale. Never mind that the fine balance is open to debate.
> 
> [...]
> 
> el