[CCWG-ACCT] [ianatransition] U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Full Hearing on 24 May 2016
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.na
Wed May 25 20:57:12 UTC 2016
It is a bit of a nuisance CCing lists others can't post to....
el
--
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4
> On 25 May 2016, at 21:54, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
>
>
>> On 25 May 2016, at 21:29, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>> The transition proposal is simply a proposal to eliminate a function that is unneeded and does no work.
> [...]
>
> Nothing in this is simple, and whether it is unneeded is open for debate.
>
> However when it suits ICANN it alleges that the function does work.
>
>>
>>> Why is it seen as "a little insulting"?
>>
>> Because people all over the world have worked tirelessly over the past
>> several years to hammer out a detailed consensus that finely balances
>> a whole bunch of considerations,
> [...]
>
> The amount of work can not be used as rationale. Never mind that the fine balance is open to debate.
>
> [...]
>
> el
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list