[CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
Greg Shatan
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Apr 13 21:10:16 UTC 2017
I'm fairly confident that this is what the letter is saying:
The Board also expresses its support for the additional efforts *[i.e., the
considerations document]* to complete a review of the items noted in WS1
Annex 12 to ensure they have been fully covered in the draft FOI, and to
further inform the development of additional implementation recommendations
to accompany the FOI *[someone is supposed to develop additional
implementation recommendations]*.
As part of those implementation recommendations, the Board is asking ICANN
organization *[i.e., staff]* to conduct an impact assessment to understand
how the implementation of the recommendations would impact the
organization. *[It appears that the staff is developing these
implementation recommendations.]* The Board encourages the CCWG *[i.e.,
this Subgroup, primarily] *to provide examples of how the FoI is to be
implemented and the areas of work that the FoI is expected to impact to
assist *[the staff] *with this work. This will be an important point of
information for the whole of the ICANN community *[i.e, the CCWG and the
rest of the community via public comments and SO/AC approvals]* in their
deliberations of the final recommendations.
In other words:
- The Board knows that we're working on the Considerations document.
- The Considerations document will be used to develop implementation
recommendations to accompany the FoI
- Staff is developing these implementation recommendations.
- As part of that work, Staff is doing an impact assessment.
- CCWG (really, *this subgroup*) needs to create *examples* of (1) how
the FoI is to be implemented and (2) the areas of work that the FoI is
expected to impact.
- CCWG needs to give those examples to the staff,
- Staff will use these example in doing the impact assessment.
- CCWG also needs to make these examples available to the entire ICANN
community.
- Public comments and SO/ACs should take these examples, as well as the
implementation recommendations (including the impact assessment) into
account when deciding whether to approve the final recommendations.
- Based on Niels' followup, at this point, rather than working on
examples now, we can wait until we hear from the Board (and others) in the
public comment on the initial recommendations.
Does that make sense?
(With regard to "examples," it should not be forgotten that the CCWG
Charter says "In order to facilitate evaluation and adoption of its
proposals, the CCWG-Accountability is expected to provide a detailed
description on how its proposals would provide an adequate level of
resistance to contingencies (“stress tests”), *within the scope of each
Work Stream*." (emphasis added))
Greg
-
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc at gmail.com
On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
wrote:
> That's right, I wanted to know what/who Board meant when they mention
> "ICANN organisation" I thought it was staff as it made sense to me if such
> impact assessment were formerly conducted by staff to better inform the
> Board and the community on implementation implications
>
> However based on Niel's message it seem it's referring to the community
> which is all clear now.
>
> Regards
>
> On Apr 13, 2017 19:40, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:
>
>> This seems reasonable. Seun had noted he thought the Board letter
>> indicated they were asking staff to do something. Seun observed that when
>> the Board says “ICANN organization”, it means staff.
>>
>> Anne
>>
>>
>>
>> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>>
>> Of Counsel
>>
>> 520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
>>
>> 520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
>>
>> AAikman at lrrc.com
>>
>> _____________________________
>>
>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>
>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>
>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>
>> lrrc.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] *On
>> Behalf Of *Greg Shatan
>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:06 AM
>> *To:* McAuley, David
>> *Cc:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org; ws2-hr at icann.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree with Niels and David.
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg
>>
>>
>>
>> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
>> S: gsshatan
>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, McAuley, David via Ws2-hr <
>> ws2-hr at icann.org> wrote:
>>
>> This seems like a good approach Niels, thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> David
>>
>> David McAuley
>> International Policy Manager
>> Verisign Inc.
>> 703-948-4154
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] On
>> Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:52 AM
>> To: Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
>> Cc: ws2-hr at icann.org; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> A board member confirmed to me that the Considerations document was not
>> considered when this letter was composed and that the Public Comment period
>> is probably the best moment for the board to give input this.
>>
>> I would propose that the CCWG co-chairs and I will respond with a letter
>> to the board that it seems we have addressed most issues with the FoI and
>> Considerations document and that we would like to invite the board to
>> continue to provide input via discussions in the plenary, the subgroup and
>> during the upcoming public comments period for this document.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Niels
>>
>> On 04/13/2017 12:06 AM, Remmy Nweke wrote:
>> > Definitely this letter is not for this group.
>> >
>> > Like Niels noted, we may wait until the public comment to get more
>> > information from the Board on this and remain focused on the current
>> > assignment.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Remmy
>> >
>> > ____
>> > REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
>> > Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor, DigitalSENSE Africa Media
>> > [/Multiple-award winning medium/] (DigitalSENSE Business News
>> > <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
>> > <http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet
>> > <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>) Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin
>> > Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
>> > M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>> > <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>> > Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>> > <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria>
>> > PC Summit 2017 <http://www.pcsummit.com.ng>, December 7-8 @Federal
>> > Palace, Victoria Island, Lagos.
>> >
>> > *Vice President, African Civil Society on the Information Society
>> > (ACSIS
>> > <http://www.acsis-scasi.org/en/>)
>> > _________________________________________________________________
>> > *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>> > attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information.
>> > It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke
>> > does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail.
>> > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately,
>> > then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this
>> > document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face
>> > court persecution.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Niels ten Oever
>> > <lists at nielstenoever.net <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > I am forwarding you a letter that I and the CCWG co-chairs received
>> from
>> > the board, please find it attached.
>> >
>> > It seems like this letter was composed before the Considerations
>> > document was finalized, therefore I think it would be apt that we
>> > continue with our readings and ask the board to provide us with
>> their
>> > analysis during the Public Comments period.
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> >
>> > Niels
>> >
>> > --
>> > Niels ten Oever
>> > Head of Digital
>> >
>> > Article 19
>> > www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
>> >
>> > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>> > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ws2-hr mailing list
>> > Ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr at icann.org>
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>> > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Niels ten Oever
>> Head of Digital
>>
>> Article 19
>> www.article19.org
>>
>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 ______________________________
>> _________________
>>
>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170413/5780746f/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list