[CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights

[Matthew Shears]

Agree as well - thanks Greg.


On 13/04/2017 22:19, McAuley, David via Accountability-Cross-Community 
wrote:
>
> [Part of string deleted to make shorter]
>
> This makes sense to me, Greg, especially the last bullet – would be 
> nice to hear from Board on their assessment (presumably not yet 
> stated) on the “Considerations” portion of the unified subgroup document.
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154
>
> *From:*Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 5:10 PM
> *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com>; <ws2-hr at icann.org> 
> <ws2-hr at icann.org>; McAuley, David <dmcauley at Verisign.com>; 
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>
> I'm fairly confident that this is what the letter is saying:
>
> The Board also expresses its support for the additional efforts 
> *[i.e., the considerations document]* to complete a review of the 
> items noted in WS1 Annex 12 to ensure they have been fully covered in 
> the draft FOI, and to further inform the development of additional 
> implementation recommendations to accompany the FOI *[someone is 
> supposed to develop additional implementation recommendations]*.
>
> As part of those implementation recommendations, the Board is asking 
> ICANN organization *[i.e., staff]* to conduct an impact assessment to 
> understand how the implementation of the recommendations would impact 
> the organization. *[It appears that the staff is developing these 
> implementation recommendations.]* The Board encourages the CCWG 
> *[i.e., this Subgroup, primarily] *to provide examples of how the FoI 
> is to be implemented and the areas of work that the FoI is expected to 
> impact to assist *[the staff] *with this work. This will be an 
> important point of information for the whole of the ICANN community 
> *[i.e, the CCWG and the rest of the community via public comments and 
> SO/AC approvals]* in their deliberations of the final recommendations.
>
> In other words:
>
>   * The Board knows that we're working on the Considerations document.
>   * The Considerations document will be used to develop implementation
>     recommendations to accompany the FoI
>   * Staff is developing these implementation recommendations.
>
>       o As part of that work, Staff is doing an impact assessment.
>
>   * CCWG (really, _this subgroup_) needs to create _examples_ of (1)
>     how the FoI is to be implemented and (2) the areas of work that
>     the FoI is expected to impact.
>   * CCWG needs to give those examples to the staff,
>
>       o Staff will use these example in doing the impact assessment.
>
>   * CCWG also needs to make these examples available to the entire
>     ICANN community.
>
>       o Public comments and SO/ACs should take these examples, as well
>         as the implementation recommendations (including the impact
>         assessment) into account when deciding whether to approve the
>         final recommendations.
>
>   * Based on Niels' followup, at this point, rather than working on
>     examples now, we can wait until we hear from the Board (and
>     others) in the public comment on the initial recommendations.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> (With regard to "examples," it should not be forgotten that the CCWG 
> Charter says "In order to facilitate evaluation and adoption of its 
> proposals, the CCWG-Accountability is expected to provide a detailed 
> description on how its proposals would provide an adequate level of 
> resistance to contingencies (“stress tests”), *within the scope of 
> each Work Stream*." (emphasis added))
>
> Greg
>
>  *
>
>
> *Greg Shatan
> *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-- 
Matthew Shears
matthew at intpolicy.com
+447712472987
Skype:mshears

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170413/66593010/attachment-0001.html>