[CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights

[Greg Shatan]

Paul,

Advice of counsel.

😁😨😱😵👹


*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
S: gsshatan
Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
gregshatanipc at gmail.com


On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Matthew Shears <matthew at intpolicy.com>
wrote:

> Agree as well - thanks Greg.
>
> On 13/04/2017 22:19, McAuley, David via Accountability-Cross-Community
> wrote:
>
> [Part of string deleted to make shorter]
>
>
>
> This makes sense to me, Greg, especially the last bullet – would be nice
> to hear from Board on their assessment (presumably not yet stated) on the
> “Considerations” portion of the unified subgroup document.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> David
>
>
>
> David McAuley
>
> International Policy Manager
>
> Verisign Inc.
>
> 703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 5:10 PM
> *To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lrrc.com> <AAikman at lrrc.com>;
> <ws2-hr at icann.org> <ws2-hr at icann.org> <ws2-hr at icann.org>
> <ws2-hr at icann.org>; McAuley, David <dmcauley at Verisign.com>
> <dmcauley at Verisign.com>; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>
>
>
> I'm fairly confident that this is what the letter is saying:
>
>
>
> The Board also expresses its support for the additional efforts *[i.e.,
> the considerations document]* to complete a review of the items noted in
> WS1 Annex 12 to ensure they have been fully covered in the draft FOI, and
> to further inform the development of additional implementation
> recommendations to accompany the FOI *[someone is supposed to develop
> additional implementation recommendations]*.
>
>
>
> As part of those implementation recommendations, the Board is asking ICANN
> organization *[i.e., staff]* to conduct an impact assessment to
> understand how the implementation of the recommendations would impact the
> organization. *[It appears that the staff is developing these
> implementation recommendations.]* The Board encourages the CCWG *[i.e.,
> this Subgroup, primarily] *to provide examples of how the FoI is to be
> implemented and the areas of work that the FoI is expected to impact to
> assist *[the staff] *with this work. This will be an important point of
> information for the whole of the ICANN community *[i.e, the CCWG and the
> rest of the community via public comments and SO/AC approvals]* in their
> deliberations of the final recommendations.
>
>
>
> In other words:
>
>
>
>    - The Board knows that we're working on the Considerations document.
>    - The Considerations document will be used to develop implementation
>    recommendations to accompany the FoI
>    - Staff is developing these implementation recommendations.
>
>
>    - As part of that work, Staff is doing an impact assessment.
>
>
>    - CCWG (really, *this subgroup*) needs to create *examples* of (1) how
>    the FoI is to be implemented and (2) the areas of work that the FoI is
>    expected to impact.
>    - CCWG needs to give those examples to the staff,
>
>
>    - Staff will use these example in doing the impact assessment.
>
>
>    - CCWG also needs to make these examples available to the entire ICANN
>    community.
>
>
>    - Public comments and SO/ACs should take these examples, as well as
>       the implementation recommendations (including the impact assessment) into
>       account when deciding whether to approve the final recommendations.
>
>
>    - Based on Niels' followup, at this point, rather than working on
>    examples now, we can wait until we hear from the Board (and others) in the
>    public comment on the initial recommendations.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
>
>
> (With regard to "examples," it should not be forgotten that the CCWG
> Charter says "In order to facilitate evaluation and adoption of its
> proposals, the CCWG-Accountability is expected to provide a detailed
> description on how its proposals would provide an adequate level of
> resistance to contingencies (“stress tests”), *within the scope of each
> Work Stream*." (emphasis added))
>
>
>
> Greg
>
>    -
>
>
>
> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> Virus-free.
> www.avg.com
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
> <#m_1560462168413596224_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing listAccountability-Cross-Community at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> --
> Matthew Shearsmatthew at intpolicy.com+447712472987 <+44%207712%20472987>Skype:mshears
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170413/0353e02e/attachment.html>