[CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Fri Apr 14 05:05:23 UTC 2017
Exactly what I had earlier interpreted the letter to mean, but it's okay
that we can at least agree with Greg instead. ;-)
Happy Easter to everyone who celebrates it.
Regards
On Apr 13, 2017 22:10, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm fairly confident that this is what the letter is saying:
>
> The Board also expresses its support for the additional efforts *[i.e.,
> the considerations document]* to complete a review of the items noted in
> WS1 Annex 12 to ensure they have been fully covered in the draft FOI, and
> to further inform the development of additional implementation
> recommendations to accompany the FOI *[someone is supposed to develop
> additional implementation recommendations]*.
>
> As part of those implementation recommendations, the Board is asking ICANN
> organization *[i.e., staff]* to conduct an impact assessment to
> understand how the implementation of the recommendations would impact the
> organization. *[It appears that the staff is developing these
> implementation recommendations.]* The Board encourages the CCWG *[i.e.,
> this Subgroup, primarily] *to provide examples of how the FoI is to be
> implemented and the areas of work that the FoI is expected to impact to
> assist *[the staff] *with this work. This will be an important point of
> information for the whole of the ICANN community *[i.e, the CCWG and the
> rest of the community via public comments and SO/AC approvals]* in their
> deliberations of the final recommendations.
>
> In other words:
>
>
> - The Board knows that we're working on the Considerations document.
> - The Considerations document will be used to develop implementation
> recommendations to accompany the FoI
> - Staff is developing these implementation recommendations.
> - As part of that work, Staff is doing an impact assessment.
> - CCWG (really, *this subgroup*) needs to create *examples* of (1) how
> the FoI is to be implemented and (2) the areas of work that the FoI is
> expected to impact.
> - CCWG needs to give those examples to the staff,
> - Staff will use these example in doing the impact assessment.
> - CCWG also needs to make these examples available to the entire ICANN
> community.
> - Public comments and SO/ACs should take these examples, as well as
> the implementation recommendations (including the impact assessment) into
> account when deciding whether to approve the final recommendations.
> - Based on Niels' followup, at this point, rather than working on
> examples now, we can wait until we hear from the Board (and others) in the
> public comment on the initial recommendations.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> (With regard to "examples," it should not be forgotten that the CCWG
> Charter says "In order to facilitate evaluation and adoption of its
> proposals, the CCWG-Accountability is expected to provide a detailed
> description on how its proposals would provide an adequate level of
> resistance to contingencies (“stress tests”), *within the scope of each
> Work Stream*." (emphasis added))
>
> Greg
>
> -
>
>
>
> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That's right, I wanted to know what/who Board meant when they mention
>> "ICANN organisation" I thought it was staff as it made sense to me if such
>> impact assessment were formerly conducted by staff to better inform the
>> Board and the community on implementation implications
>>
>> However based on Niel's message it seem it's referring to the community
>> which is all clear now.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2017 19:40, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman at lrrc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This seems reasonable. Seun had noted he thought the Board letter
>>> indicated they were asking staff to do something. Seun observed that when
>>> the Board says “ICANN organization”, it means staff.
>>>
>>> Anne
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
>>>
>>> Of Counsel
>>>
>>> 520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
>>>
>>> 520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
>>>
>>> AAikman at lrrc.com
>>>
>>> _____________________________
>>>
>>> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
>>>
>>> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
>>>
>>> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
>>>
>>> lrrc.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Greg Shatan
>>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:06 AM
>>> *To:* McAuley, David
>>> *Cc:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org; ws2-hr at icann.org
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree with Niels and David.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428>
>>> S: gsshatan
>>> Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428>
>>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:58 AM, McAuley, David via Ws2-hr <
>>> ws2-hr at icann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> This seems like a good approach Niels, thank you.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> David
>>>
>>> David McAuley
>>> International Policy Manager
>>> Verisign Inc.
>>> 703-948-4154
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 11:52 AM
>>> To: Remmy Nweke <remmyn at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: ws2-hr at icann.org; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Letter from the Board on Human Rights
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> A board member confirmed to me that the Considerations document was not
>>> considered when this letter was composed and that the Public Comment period
>>> is probably the best moment for the board to give input this.
>>>
>>> I would propose that the CCWG co-chairs and I will respond with a
>>> letter to the board that it seems we have addressed most issues with the
>>> FoI and Considerations document and that we would like to invite the board
>>> to continue to provide input via discussions in the plenary, the subgroup
>>> and during the upcoming public comments period for this document.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Niels
>>>
>>> On 04/13/2017 12:06 AM, Remmy Nweke wrote:
>>> > Definitely this letter is not for this group.
>>> >
>>> > Like Niels noted, we may wait until the public comment to get more
>>> > information from the Board on this and remain focused on the current
>>> > assignment.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Remmy
>>> >
>>> > ____
>>> > REMMY NWEKE, mNGE,
>>> > Lead Strategist/Group Executive Editor, DigitalSENSE Africa Media
>>> > [/Multiple-award winning medium/] (DigitalSENSE Business News
>>> > <http://www.digitalsenseafrica.com.ng/businessnews>; ITREALMS
>>> > <http://www.itrealms.com.ng>, NaijaAgroNet
>>> > <http://www.naijaagronet.com.ng>) Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin
>>> > Plaza, Bolade Junction, Oshodi-Lagos
>>> > M: 234-8033592762, 8023122558, 8051000475, T: @ITRealms
>>> > <http://www.twitter.com/ITRealms>
>>> > Author: A Decade of ICT Reportage in Nigeria
>>> > <https://www.facebook.com/adecadeofictreportageinnigeria>
>>> > PC Summit 2017 <http://www.pcsummit.com.ng>, December 7-8 @Federal
>>> > Palace, Victoria Island, Lagos.
>>> >
>>> > *Vice President, African Civil Society on the Information Society
>>> > (ACSIS
>>> > <http://www.acsis-scasi.org/en/>)
>>> > _________________________________________________________________
>>> > *Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and
>>> > attachments are confidential and may also be privileged information.
>>> > It is intended only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke
>>> > does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this e-mail.
>>> > If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me immediately,
>>> > then delete this document and do not disclose the contents of this
>>> > document to any other person, nor make any copies. Violators may face
>>> > court persecution.
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Niels ten Oever
>>> > <lists at nielstenoever.net <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Dear all,
>>> >
>>> > I am forwarding you a letter that I and the CCWG co-chairs
>>> received from
>>> > the board, please find it attached.
>>> >
>>> > It seems like this letter was composed before the Considerations
>>> > document was finalized, therefore I think it would be apt that we
>>> > continue with our readings and ask the board to provide us with
>>> their
>>> > analysis during the Public Comments period.
>>> >
>>> > All the best,
>>> >
>>> > Niels
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Niels ten Oever
>>> > Head of Digital
>>> >
>>> > Article 19
>>> > www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
>>> >
>>> > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>> > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Ws2-hr mailing list
>>> > Ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr at icann.org>
>>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>> > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> Niels ten Oever
>>> Head of Digital
>>>
>>> Article 19
>>> www.article19.org
>>>
>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
>>> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
>>> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
>>> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
>>> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
>>> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
>>> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
>>> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
>>> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
>>> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
>>> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170414/ef5a7e7e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list