[CCWG-ACCT] General issue that came in Staff Accountability subgroup

[Thomas Rickert]

Hi Avri,
that is a great idea. We should use consistent terminology in all our efforts. Putting it in AOB for the call is a good idea. 

BTW - I will only be able to attend part of the call in several hours due to travel.

Best
Thomas

> Am 22.02.2017 um 07:24 schrieb avri doria <avri at acm.org>:
> 
> 
> But which I have seen elsewhere.
> 
> Does/should WS2  have a consistent terminology for deal with the
> dichotomy between a single ICANN multistakeholder organization and the
> Trinity of Board, Staff & the community.
> 
> Each person writing a doc finds another clever way to try and express
> this, but they all differ a bit.
> 
> It struck us that it might be useful for there to be one set of language
> for expressing this across the work we are doing. Is there such a set of
> terminology that I have missed?
> 
> perhaps this can be added to AOB in the plenary meeting?
> 
> thanks
> 
> avri
> 
> 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community