[CCWG-ACCT] General issue that came in Staff Accountability subgroup

[Sebastien Bachollet]

Will be very useful.
But will certainly need more time to sort that out that just in AOB ;)
Tall to you soon.
All the best
SeB

> Le 22 févr. 2017 à 09:04, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Avri,
> that is a great idea. We should use consistent terminology in all our efforts. Putting it in AOB for the call is a good idea. 
> 
> BTW - I will only be able to attend part of the call in several hours due to travel.
> 
> Best
> Thomas
> 
>> Am 22.02.2017 um 07:24 schrieb avri doria <avri at acm.org>:
>> 
>> 
>> But which I have seen elsewhere.
>> 
>> Does/should WS2  have a consistent terminology for deal with the
>> dichotomy between a single ICANN multistakeholder organization and the
>> Trinity of Board, Staff & the community.
>> 
>> Each person writing a doc finds another clever way to try and express
>> this, but they all differ a bit.
>> 
>> It struck us that it might be useful for there to be one set of language
>> for expressing this across the work we are doing. Is there such a set of
>> terminology that I have missed?
>> 
>> perhaps this can be added to AOB in the plenary meeting?
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community