[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability-WS2 Answer on ombuds

[Sebicann Bachollet]

Thanks Bernard.
I understand that this answer doesn’t impact the proposal of the subgroup report regarding IOO.
All the best
SeB

> Le 27 oct. 2017 à 08:45, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ​Form Samantha Eisner:
> 
> The answer to the question of: "The ultimate responsibility for the Ombuds
> office must remain with the Board »² is yes.  There has to be a line of
> accountability from the Ombuds to the Board.  This is particularly
> important as it is the Board¹s obligation to make sure that the Bylaws
> requirements are met appropriately, and also consdiering the internal
> access that the Ombuds is granted and the focus of ³internal² evaluation.
> This does not mean that that others cannot give inputs to the Board on
> that relationship with the Ombudsman.
> ‹
> Samantha Eisner
> Deputy General Counsel, ICANN
> 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
> Los Angeles, California 90094
> USA
> Direct Dial: +1 310 578 8631 <tel:%2B1%20310%20578%208631>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20171027/b73aa11d/attachment.html>