[CCWG-ACCT] a post WS2 world (and what it might look like)

[Niels ten Oever]

Hi Jordan,

Thanks for this. Reply in-line:

On 04/12/2018 11:23 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:
> hi Neils, all
> 
> I stand to be corrected, but the agreement of the CCWG at the meeting in
> Puerto Rico was that there would be an implementation oversight team
> comprised of the co-chairs and rapporteurs for WS2 available to help
> with implementation. The CCWG leadership also met with a subset of the
> Board in Puerto Rico to discuss this approach, and that availability was
> welcomed.
> 

The way I understood the Implementation Oversight Team (with the timely
abbreviation IOT) is that they function as a resource, not a workforce.


> Two more points. My hope is that ICANN will prepare an implementation
> plan for WS2, and then consult with the community on it, to make sure
> the priorities and pace etc are right. That's what we have suggested. 
> We all know, and have acknowledged, that the WS2 programme won't be
> implemented in one hit, the same way as WS1 was, due to the absence of
> the deadline and the nature of the recommendations.

If ICANN org will lead the implementation plan, how does this jive with
the the implementations the community needs to make?

Have we already got signals from ICANN ORG that they are actually
working on an implementation plan?

> 
> Finally, I'd note that we have striven hard to make sure that WS2
> recommendations generally don't require bylaws changes. A lot of them
> are process changes within the organisation. So there is not likely to
> be a huge package of bylaws changes drafted after the WS2 report (though
> I suppose that bylaws changes if required will be outlined in any
> implementation plan).
> 

Should the suggested bylaw changes, or at least the bylaw that would
need change, be part of the WS2 report you think?

Best,

Niels

> cheers
> Jordan (speaking as a participant, not as a Co-Chair)
> 
> On 12 April 2018 at 22:39, Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
> <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi all,
> 
>     I might be slightly confused, but according to the current trajectory we
>     will be done with WS2 around June, as planned. But there are no concrete
>     plans for putting the recommendations and outcomes of our report into
>     place. This worries me, because when they become part of the bylaws,
>     they should be implemented, and I think we should have a plan for that
>     because two months go over very quickly.
> 
>     Does this mean we need to charter a new CCWG ? Do we need committees or
>     working groups for every recommendation ? Or will this be lead or
>     coordinated by ICANN the organization (and how does that integrate with
>     recommendations aimed at the community) ?
> 
>     Every attempt to resolve my confusion would be greatly appreciated!
> 
>     Best,
> 
>     Niels
> 
>     --
>     Niels ten Oever
> 
>     PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                        678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>     _______________________________________________
>     Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>     Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>     <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>     <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> *Jordan Carter*
> 
> Group Chief Executive
> 
> InternetNZ
> 
> 
> Office: +64 4 495 2118 <tel:04-495%202118> | Mobile: +64 21 442 649
> <tel:021%20442%20649> | Skype: jordancarter
> 
> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz <mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
> 
> 
> /A better world through a better Internet /
> /
> /

-- 
Niels ten Oever

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9