<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Thomas( Schneider)</div><div>As you remember since long time ago, I expressed my willingness and volunteered to be one of the GAC Members to accountability</div><div>The issues goes back to July when for the first time the issue of Accountability working group was announced by ICANN</div><div>This was reflected in several e-mails exchanged with Header Dryden the GAC chair.</div><div>When you ( Thomas Schneider ) took, the chair responsibilities I did recall you again of that request.</div><div>Your response was not clear , Finally you announced the names and put me as additional GAC members <u>representing</u> ICG ( FROM GAC) .Your message was interpreted that I am not Member of CCWG but a Participant</div><div>Then it is incumbent on you to clarify THE MATTER </div><div>I AM A CCWG MEMBER AND NOT PARTICIPANT</div><div>PLS MAKE NECESSARY CORRECTIVE MEASURES</div><div>Regards</div><div>K.arasteh </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2014-12-09 12:26 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think the answer lies here:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/2014-December/000123.html" target="_blank">http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-dt/2014-December/000123.html</a><br>
<br>
where it clearly states that you are not one of the 5 GAC "members"<br>
but "been appointed as ICG liaison to the CCWG" which from the<br>
context I assume means CCWG-Accountability.<br>
<br>
Why don't you take this up with your GAC chair, Mr Schneider?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
el<br>
</font></span><span><br>
<br>
On 2014-12-09 11:45 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<br>
> Dear All,<br>
> Sorry my connection was interrupted two times, I repeat<br>
> Dear All<br>
><br>
> Most of the thing foreseen to be done are directly related to ICG<br>
> activities .<br>
> I do not understand how the repreventatives of ICG would be given the<br>
> right to take part in consensus building.The confusion came from the<br>
> message sent by Thomas in his announcement that it did not make it<br>
> clear that I am among the 5 members of GAC ,REPRESTING ICG.<br>
> There are problems in the whole process.<br>
> I agree with Richard that it is impossible that more than 150 people<br>
> attend a live virtual meeting of one hour.<br>
> I am not aware of the process in CWG but in ICG only the members raise<br>
> hand and ask for the floor.<br>
> I do not see any light at the end of the CCWG Tunnel.<br>
> I need clarification from chair and corrective measures from Thomas to<br>
> announce me as he should have announced it<br>
> Regards<br>
> Kavouss<br>
><br>
</span>[...]<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>