<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Mr Arasteh is right in his first paragraph, and I second his second.</div><div><br></div><div>el</div><div><br>Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini</div><div><br>On Dec 16, 2014, at 23:10, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear All,</div><div>Any treaty unless is ratified by the parties adhered to it is not binding.</div><div>Moreover, International Customary Law is merely applicable between states and not priovaite coopration ,Moreover, it is not legally binding . However, like many other similar cases it is only morally binding.</div><div>Consequently that would not be applicable notr to be referred to by CCWG.</div><div>i SUGGEST WE DO NOT GET INTO THAT DELEMA ,otherwise we never get out of it due to the fact that there are divergence view even between professionals on lega affairs</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">[...]</blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>