<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Mathieu,<br>
<br>
Thank you for the revision.<br>
<br>
To respond to the comment re: clarification of the difference(s)
between scenarios #1 and #2.<br>
<br>
Scenario #1 addresses the possibility that additions,
modifications or deletions of strings within the IANA root zone
are, for some reason, not accomplished. The zone is frozen. No
TLDs added, no TLDs deleted.<br>
<br>
Scenario #2 addresses the possibility that changes to delegations
are, for some reason, not accomplished. Delegations from the zone
are frozen. No NS records are updated.<br>
<br>
They could be merged though I personally see freezing the zone as
a different form of failure than refusing to make requested
changes to delegations.<br>
<br>
To respond to the comment re: clarification of the difference(s)
between scenarios #5 and #6.<br>
<br>
Hyperinflation (Weimar Republic,
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
June 1921 to January 1924) or a global financial crisis (2007 -
2008) would have an effect on the corporation's reserves, which a
domain-industry-specific collapse would not. Both would reduce
recurring revenues, but the latter would not necessarily
compromise the reserve fund, and the former would. So #5 is
survivable, until the reserve is exhausted, #6 is not.<br>
<br>
Please let me know your thoughts. I'll review the comments of
others today and tomorrow and post a revision on Saturday. The
revision will include a first "cook book recipes" for designing,
conducting and analyzing each scenario hypothetically.<br>
<br>
The capture and abuse of accountability scenarios are welcome
additions.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Eric<br>
<br>
On 1/8/15 8:56 AM, Mathieu Weill wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:54AEB6BD.7080608@afnic.fr" type="cite">Dear
Eric,
<br>
<br>
Once again thank you for this very useful first list. I find it is
already quite advanced. I attach a revised version with several
personal comments and proposals, including a couple of additional
scenarios around capture on the one side, the ability for a
minority of stakeholders to abuse accountability mechanisms to
effectively paralyze Icann.
<br>
<br>
Best,
<br>
Mathieu
<br>
<br>
Le 06/01/2015 07:45, Eric Brunner-Williams a écrit :
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">Colleagues,
<br>
<br>
Attached please find an initial set of scenarios, in two pages,
in .pdf and .docx formats.
<br>
<br>
Feedback via email please, either to me directly
(<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>) or to the WS4 sublist
(<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ccwg-accountability4@icann.org">ccwg-accountability4@icann.org</a>).
<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance,
<br>
Eric Brunner-Williams
<br>
Eugene, Oregon
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>