<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
Hi,<br>
<br>
Additionally, borrowing from a another professional field: whenever
contemplating surgery, get a second opinion.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22-Jan-15 12:00, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+aOHURg_nbctVU=hHG22W+YL6qxnjXrdJX9st0_cobdHvSDRA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">I agree with Becky, Eberhard, Phil, Paul and David,
for all their reasons and more. If ICANN legal had all the
expertise necessary, it would be a bad idea, due to lack of
independence, ethical obligations to their client, etc. And
even if they are reasonably well-informed on California
non-profit law, that is necessary but not sufficient for the
task at hand. Someone with considerable expertise and
experience in corporate governance (especially non-profit) and
corporate structuring in a variety of contexts (a "big brain,"
so to speak) is also necessary.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(Notably, when ICANN has needed significant advice in this
area in the past, it is my impression that they have turned to
the international mega firm of Jones Day (the biggest thing to
come out of Cleveland, Ohio since <br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Greg Shatan</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<p><b><span>Gregory S. Shatan</span><span> </span></b></p>
<p><span>Partner</span><span> |</span><b><span> </span></b><b><span>Abelman
Frayne & Schwab</span></b></p>
<p><span></span></p>
<p><b><span>666 Third Avenue </span></b><b><span>|</span></b><b><span>
New York, NY 10017-5621</span></b><span></span></p>
<p><b><span>Direct</span></b><span> </span><span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
value="+12128859253">212-885-9253</a> <b>| </b></span><b><span>Main</span></b><span> </span><span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
value="+12129499022">212-949-9022</a></span><span></span></p>
<p><b><span>Fax</span></b><span> </span><span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
value="+12129499190">212-949-9190</a> <b>|</b> </span><b><span>Cell </span></b><span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
value="+19178166428">917-816-6428</a></span><span></span></p>
<p><b><i><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gsshatan@lawabel.com"
target="_blank">gsshatan@lawabel.com</a></span></i></b></p>
<p><b>ICANN-related: <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com"
target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a> </b></p>
<p><b><i><span><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.lawabel.com/"
target="_blank">www.lawabel.com</a></span></i></b></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM,
Dr Eberhard Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:el@lisse.na"
target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">Eric,<br>
<br>
I was not looking at it from that perspective, but
Becky make sense,<br>
ie if we get an opinion that is contrary to what ICANN
has<br>
previously asserted in court it would put ICANN in a
difficult<br>
position.<br>
<br>
Almost as much as their Counsel estopping ICANN on
anything not yet<br>
litigated.<br>
<br>
<br>
So, we need "unconflicted" Counsel.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><br>
el<br>
</span><span class=""><br>
On 2015-01-22 16:49, Burr, Becky wrote:<br>
> Eric, I have great respect for the ICANN legal
staff, but Iım not<br>
> aware that anyone on staff possesses legal
expertise on<br>
> international law and/or California
not-for-profit law. More that<br>
> that, we know that ICANN has asserted various
limitations on some<br>
> of the accountability mechanisms based on the
³fiduciary duty²<br>
> of Board members to the corporation. Whether
the ideas in<br>
> question are good or bad, there is some
skepticism - and a<br>
> conclusion by the Berkman Center during the
first ATRT review that<br>
> additional legal research was needed, about the
legal positions<br>
> asserted by ICANNıs legal staff and its outside
counsel. Given<br>
> the above, and ethical obligation of counsel to
defend the views<br>
> of its client vigorously, I disagree with your
view that ICANNıs<br>
> counsel is well situated to provide the legal
analysis we need.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> J. Beckwith Burr<br>
<br>
</span>[...]<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>