<p dir="ltr">sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
On 24 Jan 2015 11:50, "Dr Eberhard W Lisse" <<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na">el@lisse.na</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
<snip></p>
<p dir="ltr">Now you have written what looks like reason below, which makes it a helpful response to the question asked.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Thanks<br>
><br>
> In any case and notwithstanding that my position on the regional organization(s) has been well documented for well over 8 years, as not all ccTLD Managers are members of a RO, even a legitimate RO can only represent represent its members. <br>
><br>
> This is consistent with my repeatedly stated position that AC/SOs can not be come "members" as they do not represent all TLDs. <br>
><br>
><br>
> Even to the the most cursory observer it should be obvious that adding unaccountable "members" will not increase Accountability.<br>
><br>
> el<br>
><br>
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini<br>
><br>
> On Jan 24, 2015, at 12:23, Seun Ojedeji <<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> The question was:<br>
>><br>
>> " Could you explain your reasoning so that we can better understand your position? "<br>
>><br>
>> And your response is that you "fundamentally" oppose it... Perhaps you can do better in giving reason.<br>
>><br>
>> Thanks<br>
>> sent from Google nexus 4<br>
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.<br>
><br>
> [...]<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
><br>
</p>