<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Steve,<br>
      <br>
      Nothing?<br>
      <br>
      There remains the role of the USG, and its contractor, Verisign,
      as two of the three parties to the Root Zone Partners. <br>
      <br>
      There remains the NRO with its increasing distinct stewardship
      responsibility.<br>
      <br>
      There remains the IETF/IAB with its increasing distinct
      stewardship responsibility.<br>
      <br>
      As hypos this, and your flight-to-avoid-jurisdiction, may be fun
      and games speculatively, though not rising to the level of "gunmen
      menace the periodic review team" of the ALAC scenarios, but it
      assumes either wild wrecklessness on the part of some fairly sane
      people -- ICANN blows off the IP and DNS components of what is a
      semi-stable troika, or sudden onset blindness on the part of some
      fairly sane people -- the IP and DNS components blithly following
      an erratic executive shredding accountability agreements.<br>
      <br>
      There are less unlikely scenarios that deserve more attention.<br>
      <br>
      As for Peter, in the course of his many years as Board Chair he's
      said many things, some right and some wrong.<br>
      <br>
      The Board has a liaison and his expression in the present would be
      pertinent, that of a past member of the Board only possibly
      informative. <br>
      <br>
      Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
      Eugene, Oregon<br>
      <br>
      On 1/29/15 2:47 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:7E3C25B5-C2D0-479C-A577-C55586026849@netchoice.org"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div>
        <div>
          <div>Eric — Your first question helps make my point: After the
            USG lets of of IANA contract leverage, there is nothing they
            could do to hold ICANN to the Affirmation of Commitments. </div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>As to your second question:</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="margin:0 0 0 40px; border:none;
            padding:0px;">
            <div>Within a year of signing the AoC, Peter Dengate Thrush
              told a group of EU Representatives that he saw the
              Affirmation as a temporary arrangement ICANN would like to
              eventually terminate.  (22-Jun-2010, at a dinner hosted by
              the European Internet Foundation in Brussels).</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>At a breakfast with the entire Board the next day, I
              asked ICANN board members if the commitments in the
              Affirmation should be permanently adopted as part of
              ICANN's official charter.  One board member immediately
              disagreed, saying the AoC made no commitments that weren't
              already in ICANN's bylaws.  I responded that the
              Affirmation includes important new commitments in
              paragraphs 3, 4, 7, and 8 – even before we get to the
              periodic reviews required in paragraph 9. </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div id="">
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
        <div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt;
          text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none;
          BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT:
          0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid;
          BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
          <span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Eric
          Brunner-Williams &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Thursday, January
          29, 2015 at 5:30 PM<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Jordan Carter &lt;<a
            moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Accountability
          Cross Community &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>&gt;<br>
          <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re:
          [CCWG-ACCT] The big test of effective accountability<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Steve, Jordan, and anyone else
              so inclined,<br>
              <br>
              Would you care to offer your best guess(es) as to the
              response of the Government of the United States were the
              Corporation to engage in the course of conduct proposed?<br>
              <br>
              I suspect it would look suspiciously similar to something
              we've seen before, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf">http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/fr_ianafunctionsnoi_02252011.pdf</a><br>
              <br>
              Have either of you (or others sharing the concern
              expressed by Steve and Jordan) any indication that the
              Board is or ever has considered unilateral termination of
              the AoC?
              <br>
              <br>
              Eric Brunner-Williams<br>
              Eugene, Oregon<br>
              <br>
              On 1/29/15 2:14 PM, Jordan Carter wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote
cite="mid:CAK2bTy9iy839a6aGAeK7fmqSzcBAE6pgA=MmKssq8PbD6_iyPg@mail.gmail.com"
              type="cite">
              <div dir="ltr">
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">On 30 January 2015 at 11:07,
                    Eric Brunner-Williams <span dir="ltr">
                      &lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net"
                        target="_blank">ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net</a>&gt;</span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                      0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <span class="">On 1/29/15 1:58 PM, Steve DelBianco
                        wrote:<br>
                        <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                          style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
                          Okay, so Jonathan exaggerated a bit by saying
                          we have zero accountability today.  But Avri
                          admits we have no mechanisms that are binding
                          on the board. And Avri cites the AoC, which
                          can be canceled by ICANN at any time.<br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                      </span>Would you be so kind as to offer support
                      for this ... peculiar claim?<br>
                      <span class=""><font color="#888888"><br>
                        </font></span></blockquote>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>From section 11 of the AOC:</div>
                    <div><br>
                    </div>
                    <div>"<span style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51);
                        font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif;
                        font-size: 16px; line-height:
                        22.3999996185303px;">Any party may terminate
                        this Affirmation of Commitments by providing 120
                        days written notice to the other party.</span>" </div>
                  </div>
                  <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  </div>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/affirmation-of-commitments-2009-09-30-en">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/affirmation-of-commitments-2009-09-30-en</a></div>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                </div>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://duckduckgo.com">duckduckgo.com</a> is
                  often your friend.</div>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                </div>
                <div class="gmail_extra">Jordan</div>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all">
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  -- <br>
                  <div class="gmail_signature">
                    <div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br>
                      <br>
                      Chief Executive <br>
                      <b>InternetNZ</b><br>
                      <br>
                      04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br>
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz"
                        target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><br>
                      Skype: jordancarter<br>
                      <br>
                      <i>To promote the Internet's benefits and uses,
                        and protect its potential.</i><br>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </span>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>