<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"> </span><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>
The Board has a liaison and his expression in the present would be
pertinent, that of a past member of the Board only possibly
informative. <br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'trebuchet ms',sans-serif">There is no basis for such a dismissal. That such a sentiment (the AoC is temporary and should be terminated) could be expressed at one time by the Board Chair, without censure, means it can be revived when convenient. Without appropriate accountability, the AoC can be terminated without the threat of consequences that perhaps prevented the action when it was first considered.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'trebuchet ms',sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'trebuchet ms',sans-serif">I do not envision that an accountability process is being designed simply to deal with best-case scenarios.</div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:'trebuchet ms',sans-serif">- Evan</div><br></div></div>
</div></div>