<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05-Feb-15 10:51, Seun Ojedeji wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD_dc6jwizkHP9UTyeB4GDxV0uSdaodhm=d81KKuE+asC9xbPA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Currently i believe board are formerly expected to act
in the interest of the organisation,</blockquote>
<br>
Yes they are. And they are selected because those who select think
they will do so and will do so consistent with the views of the
(s)electors.<br>
<br>
there are those who do little to nothing.<br>
there are those who never consult.<br>
there are those who forget that the community knows what is best for
the community.<br>
there are those who use their power to abuse.<br>
<br>
There needs to be a way to remove them - otherwise there is little
reality to the accountability.<br>
<br>
By all means make it difficult. <br>
Require unanimity in the various councils. <br>
Require 3 readings of the motion to remove.<br>
Require non-secret voting.<br>
&c.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">In summary, i think board member removal
process needs to be difficult by requiring certain level of
consensus across SO/AC on a particular issue that lacks other
option of resolution.</blockquote>
<br>
Yes.<br>
<br>
But it must be possible.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
</body>
</html>