<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'; font-size: 13px; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);"><blockquote type="cite">If you do insist on going this route, please make sure that the funds pass through an independent third party, and insist on a full log of calls, meetings and interactions as a condition.</blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Why?</div><div>
<style type="text/css">
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}
p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Verdana; color: #9443fb}
p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Verdana; color: #9443fb; min-height: 16.0px}
</style>
<p class="p1"><br></p>
<p class="p1"><br></p>
<p class="p2">Cheers,</p>
<p class="p3"><br></p>
<p class="p2">Chris</p>
</div>
<br><div><div>On 10 Feb 2015, at 16:54 , Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kierenmccarthy@gmail.com">kierenmccarthy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>I'm really not sure what to make of these responses. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>They describe a very pleasant world but it's not one that I recognize in ICANN's internal culture. It is really striking to me that there continues to be such a gulf between how people think the organization works and what really happens.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Needless to say, I think having ICANN pay for legal advice that is likely to contradict its own lawyers' advice on a topic that is of supreme importance to the organization is, at best, foolish.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>And that's not accounting for<span style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: transparent;"> how bad it looks externally. Any congressional aide or journalist looking at such an arrangement would immediately call into question its validity. And the man in the street would agree.</span>
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>If you do insist on going this route, please make sure that the funds pass through an independent third party, and insist on a full log of calls, meetings and interactions as a condition.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Kieren</div>
<div><br></div>
<div class="mailbox_signature">
<br>-<br>[sent through phone]</div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><p>On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Beran Gillen - Yahoo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:berangillen@yahoo.com" target="_blank">berangillen@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></p><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div dir="auto">
<div>Couldn't have said it better Avri, we are in the driving seat. Who pays for it should have no influence on what is being done or who does it. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Regards </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Beran <br><br>"There is nothing more difficult to arrange and more dangerous to carry through than initiating change..." Machiavelli <div>
<br><div>Sent from my iPhone</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<br>On 10 Feb 2015, at 10:32, Avri Doria <<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>> wrote:<br><br></div>
<blockquote type="cite">
Hi,<br><br>
I tend to agree if we are the customer and that is made clear, it
does not matter who pays the bill.<br><br>
Just like when the state pays for my legal defender i expect them to
serve my interests. <br><br>
avri<br><br><div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10-Feb-15 09:42, Chris Disspain
wrote:<br></div>
<blockquote cite="mid:8F1516E0-13AE-4E30-BD57-B81DA13D44FC@auda.org.au" type="cite">
<span>All,
<div><br></div>
<div>I can feel a slippery slope ahead. Whoever pays
‘influences’? Surely not. Lawyers are perfectly capable of
providing independent advice on law. Where there are several
possibilities they are perfectly capable of laying them out.
What you don’t want is rhetoric or too much advice. In other
words you don’t want the lawyers to say you can do a) or b)
but WE prefer a). A law firm will respond to the specific
instructions they receive. They have an obligation to do so. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>The danger is that anyone who doesn’t like the advice will
claim it is skewed in favour of X or Y. If that's then case I
suggest each group goes and gets its own advice and then we
share notes. <br><div><br></div>
<div>
<div><p class="p1"><br></p><p class="p2">Cheers,</p><p class="p3"><br></p><p class="p2">Chris (a lawyer)</p>
</div>
<br><div>
<div>On 10 Feb 2015, at 12:27 , Roelof Meijer <<a href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>>
wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>I am not a suspicious guy and could live with
ICANN paying the bill. However, due to the fact
that we need the whole community to have trust
in the expert (legal) advice we use as a working
group, I am in favor of another solution than
ICANN paying the bill.</div>
<div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Roelof</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br></div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div>
<span>From: </span>Jordan Carter <<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>><br><span>Date: </span>dinsdag 10 februari 2015 09:20<br><span>To: </span>Kieren McCarthy <<a href="mailto:kieren@kierenmccarthy.com">kieren@kierenmccarthy.com</a>><br><span>Cc: </span>Lisse Eberhard <<a href="mailto:directors@omadhina.net">directors@omadhina.net</a>>,
CCWG Accountability <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br><span>Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Responses
to questions from Jones Day<br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Kieran, all:
<div><br></div>
<div>Do you think the payment issue outranks
the fact that this CCWG's team doing legal
will be the effective client? That is, do
you think the CCWG can rely on advice that
it briefs out and manages the relationships
for, regardless of who ends up paying the
bill?</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I am not a lawyer but your last point
seems important to me.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>best,</div>
<div>Jordan</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On 10 February 2015
at 02:25, Kieren McCarthy <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:kieren@kierenmccarthy.com">kieren@kierenmccarthy.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">I can't for the life of me
understand why this group is prepared to
accept ICANN paying for external legal
advice on a topic of the highest
possible interest to ICANN.
<div><br></div>
<div>Considering the importance of this
topic, I am pretty sure that the
various internet organizations who
depend so heavily on ICANN would be
willing to pay into a fund to cover
independent legal advice. </div>
<div><br></div>
<div>I also think it would be advisable
for whoever is contracted to provide
this advice to be obligated to report
any and all approaches and
conversations with third parties in
order to limit the opportunity for
behind-the-scenes influencing. </div>
<span class="HOEnZb">
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div>Kieren</div>
<div><br></div>
</span>
</div>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb
8, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Phil Corwin <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" type="cite">
+1. ICANN has tripled its staff
in 2.5 years. Surely it can
provide the resources that this
CCWG needs to retain independent
legal advice. Until it does
this CCWG should be in a holding
pattern and if that delays the
transition so be it.<br><span><br>
Philip S. Corwin, Founding
Principal<br>
Virtualaw LLC<br>
1155 F Street, NW<br></span><span>Suite 1050<br>
Washington, DC 20004<br><a href="tel:202-559-8597">202-559-8597</a>/Direct<br><a href="tel:202-559-8750">202-559-8750</a>/Fax<br><a href="tel:202-255-6172">202-255-6172</a>/Cell<br><br>
Twitter: @VLawDC<br><br>
"Luck is the residue of
design" -- Branch Rickey<br><br></span>Sent from my iPad<br><div>
<div>
<br>
> On Feb 8, 2015, at 5:08
PM, Matthew Shears <<a href="mailto:mshears@cdt.org">mshears@cdt.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Completely agree:<br>
><br>
> I'd really like to see
ICANN demonstrate it is as
concerned with helping the
CCWG secure our independent
legal resources "in the most
efficient and cost-effective
manner" as it was in sharing
its own views and positions.<br>
><br>
><br>
> Matthew<br>
><br>
><br>
>> On 2/8/2015 9:03
AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:<br>
>> Hi all,<br>
>><br>
>> If everyone
recognizes the Jones Day
submission as input/advocacy
from an interested party and
not legal advice to the
CCWG, and that it carries no
greater weight than our
yet-to-be-received
independent advice, I have
no idea what with ICANN
putting its cards on the
table.<br>
>> I'm<br>
>> Despite the
appearance of an attempt to
influence the discussion
through first-mover
advantage, this could help
us identify early conflicts
of opinion and identify
where we need to focus our
energies.<br>
>><br>
>> That said, I'd
really like to see ICANN
demonstrate it is as
concerned with helping the
CCWG secure our independent
legal resources "in the most
efficient and cost-effective
manner" as it was in sharing
its own views and positions.<br>
>> I'm at a<br>
>> It appears there
was more urgency for the
latter.<br>
>> I'm<br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Keith<br>
>><br>
>> Sent from my iPhone<br>
>><br>
>>> On Feb 8, 2015,
at 4:25 PM, Edward Morris
<<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> One of the
reasons many of us opposed
inclusion of ICANN staff
members as participants in
the accountability and
transition working groups,
is that disagreement with
staff positions could prove
problematic for those
opposing ICANN positions. As
a sitting member of the GNSO
Council, elected by my
community, I would suggest
Samantha that you, as an
ICANN staff member, are not
tasked with determining what
is and is not an acceptable
opinion or post on this
list.<br>
>>><br>
>>> For the record,
despite your assertion, I
have not seen anyone declare
the Jones Day opinion
"incompetent". I certainly
have not. I will, however,
repeat my claim: it is a one
sided document that uses
legal opinion to support the
known preferences of a
interested party (ICANN). It
is not a neutral opinion
that we as community members
can rely upon in making our
decisions. I look forward to
receiving one so I can
discharge my responsibility
in helping your employer,
Samantha, meet it's
obligations to the both
community and to the
N.T.I.A.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Edward Morris<br>
>>><br>
>>> Sent from my
iPad<br>
>>><br>
>>>> On Feb 8,
2015, at 7:40 AM, Samantha
Eisner <<a href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Kevin, a
skilled attorney in
California corporate
structures as well as<br>
>>>> governance
issues, provided these
responses to the CCWG
questions as a<br>
>>>> mode of
giving input into the
process. Kevin has just
arrived here in<br>
>>>> Singapore
and will be available to
discuss these answers; if
modifications<br>
>>>> or
clarifications are needed,
they can be provided. These
responses, many<br>
>>>> of which
provide a transparent view
on advice or positions that
ICANN has<br>
>>>> taken in
the past on these issues,
are being provided to help
narrow and<br>
>>>> clarify the
issues for which external
advice may be sought. From
the<br>
>>>> ICANN side,
we are very interested in
making sure that the CCWG
gets the<br>
>>>> input that
it needs and in the most
efficient and cost-effective
manner;<br>
>>>> ICANN’s
transparency on this issue
will allow for other counsel
to be able<br>
>>>> to provide
advice in a quicker, more
timely manner.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> As we go
down the legal advice path,
each of us are likely to see
answers<br>
>>>> that we may
not agree with; while we do
not have to accept positions
with<br>
>>>> which we
take issue, we do need to
afford the appropriate
respect to those<br>
>>>> providing
responses. Suggestions of
“incompetence” are not
acceptable.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>>> On
2/8/15, 2:06 PM, "Edward
Morris" <<a href="mailto:egmorris1@toast.net">egmorris1@toast.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I agree
Becky. This work product is
pure advocacy that ignores<br>
>>>>>
substantial portions of the
statutes it claims to
explain. It's actually<br>
>>>>> quite
remarkable in that way.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> I only
hope we are able to retain
competent independent legal
consultant<br>
>>>>> to
guide us in this work. I
would classify the Jones Day
document as no<br>
>>>>> more
than the representation of
a policy position of an
interested party<br>
>>>>> drafted
by an attorney , not as
anything I'd consider valid
legal advice.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Sent
from my iPad<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On
Feb 8, 2015, at 5:03 AM,
Burr, Becky <<a href="mailto:Becky.Burr@neustar.biz">Becky.Burr@neustar.biz</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> The
questions and answers are
interesting as advocacy but
cannot be<br>
>>>>>>
considered legal advice for
our work<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>
Sent from my iPad<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
On Feb 8, 2015, at 12:19 PM,
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía<br>
>>>>>>>
<<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Dear all,<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Answering your questions:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Keith.- The questions were
presented by the Co-Chairs
at our Frankfut<br>
>>>>>>>
meeting as a high-level
first approach to what we
should be focusing on<br>
>>>>>>>
achieving. They were also
discussed at the CCWG call
of January 27. We<br>
>>>>>>>
then asked Staff to pass the
questions through ICANN
legal so they<br>
>>>>>>>
referred this questions to
Jones Day. The document are
the responses<br>
>>>>>>>
prepared by Kevin Espinola
of Jones Day. The goal was
to get a very<br>
>>>>>>>
rapid<br>
>>>>>>>
response on some basic
questions the group wanted
answers on.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Jordan.- I believe Adam has
clarified where the
questions came from and<br>
>>>>>>>
how they got into Jones Day
for response which is in
line with what I<br>
>>>>>>>
have<br>
>>>>>>>
replied to Keith.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Phil.- Nobody said this was
the advice we are taking.
Please see this<br>
>>>>>>>
document as one more input
document tat will feed our
work, just as the<br>
>>>>>>>
CWG legal document has fed
it. This is NOT intended to
be taken as the<br>
>>>>>>>
legal advice we¹re looking
for although in the end it
might (or might<br>
>>>>>>>
not)<br>
>>>>>>>
be compatible with what we
need.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
I hope this clarifies the
doubts and concerns raised
so far.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
Best regards,<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
León<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
El 08/02/2015, a las 12:05,
Dr Eberhard W Lisse <<a href="mailto:el@lisse.NA">el@lisse.NA</a>><br>
>>>>>>>>
escribió:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
Phil,<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
opinions of dependent
lawyers are as interesting
as the ones of<br>
>>>>>>>>
independent ones :-)-O<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
el<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
On 2015-02-08 11:48 , Jordan
Carter wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Phil, yes - the CCWG agreed
with that in Frankfurt. It
was felt it<br>
>>>>>>>>>
might<br>
>>>>>>>>>
be helpful to understand the
view of the company and its<br>
>>>>>>>>>
representatives<br>
>>>>>>>>>
as well as an independent
view, if I recall correctly.<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Jordan<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
On 8 February 2015 at 11:36,
Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:psc@vlaw-dc.com">psc@vlaw-dc.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Jones Day cannot be regarded
as an objective and neutral
source of<br>
>>>>>>>>>
legal advice or opinions on
anything related to ICANN.
Indeed, any<br>
>>>>>>>>>
statement made by Jones Day
must be regarded as the
views of ICANN,<br>
>>>>>>>>>
its long-standing client.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my BlackBerry 10
smartphone.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Philip S. Corwin, Founding
Principal<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Virtualaw LLC<br>
>>>>>>>>>
1155 F Street, NW. Suite
1050<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Washington, DC 20004<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="tel:202-559-8597">202-559-8597</a>/Direct<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="tel:202-559-8750">202-559-8750</a>/Fax<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="tel:202-255-6172">202-255-6172</a>/Cell<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Twitter: @VLawDC<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
"Luck is the residue of
design" -- Branch Rickey<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*From: *Drazek, Keith<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*Sent: *Sunday, February 8,
2015 11:14 AM<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*To: *León Felipe Sánchez
Ambía<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*Cc: *CCWG Accountability<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*Subject: *Re: [CCWG-ACCT]
Responses to questions from
Jones Day<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Leon,<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Do I understand you
correctly that Jones Day
developed both the<br>
>>>>>>>>>
questions and the answers?
Did the CCWG request this?<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Thanks,<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Keith<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Sent from my iPhone<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
On Feb 8, 2015, at 10:18 AM,
León Felipe Sánchez Ambía<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
Dear all,<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
Please find attached the
responses from Jones Day for
questions<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
prepared by Kevin Espinola.
I would like to ask you to
please<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
review the document so we
can further discuss it in
our session<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
tomorrow.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
I would also like to remind
the group that this is a
first step<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
which runs parallel to what
the legal sub-team is doing
in<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
coordination with the CWG
“legal client”. The aim is
to have this<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
responses reviewed by the
legal sub-team as well as by
the larger<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
CCWG so we can determine how
to better validate this
responses<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
with the external legal
advisors when we engage with
said external<br>
>>>>>>>>>>
advice.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
I look forward to a fruitful
session with all of you.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
Best regards,<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
León<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>
<Accountability Questions
for CCWG - from Jones
Day.pdf><br>
>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mail">
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mail</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>
man_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIET<br>
>>>>>>>>>
eDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=qwBRSEcol5<br>
>>>>>>>>>
r4bZKf-_y9unJDayHfowmd9pjeG40pqTY&s=WWqaMuLlBAG_Gr0RU6ekSk08rpZDmHGFN6<br>
>>>>>>>>>
WV735dTxo&e=<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
--<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Jordan Carter<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Chief Executive<br>
>>>>>>>>>
*InternetNZ*<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="tel:04%20495%202118">04 495
2118</a> (office) |
<a href="tel:%2B64%2021%20442%20649">+64 21 442
649</a> (mob)<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
Skype: jordancarter<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
/To promote the Internet's
benefits and uses, and
protect its<br>
>>>>>>>>>
potential./<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mail">
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mail</a><br>
>>>>>>>>>
man_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIET<br>
>>>>>>>>>
eDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=qwBRSEcol5<br>
>>>>>>>>>
r4bZKf-_y9unJDayHfowmd9pjeG40pqTY&s=WWqaMuLlBAG_Gr0RU6ekSk08rpZDmHGFN6<br>
>>>>>>>>>
WV735dTxo&e=<br>
>>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>>>>>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailm">
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailm</a><br>
>>>>>>>>
an_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeD<br>
>>>>>>>>
ALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=qwBRSEcol5r4b<br>
>>>>>>>>
ZKf-_y9unJDayHfowmd9pjeG40pqTY&s=WWqaMuLlBAG_Gr0RU6ekSk08rpZDmHGFN6WV73<br>
>>>>>>>>
5dTxo&e=<br>
>>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>>>>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailma">
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailma</a><br>
>>>>>>>
n_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDAL<br>
>>>>>>>
C_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=qwBRSEcol5r4bZKf<br>
>>>>>>>
-_y9unJDayHfowmd9pjeG40pqTY&s=WWqaMuLlBAG_Gr0RU6ekSk08rpZDmHGFN6WV735dTx<br>
>>>>>>>
o&e=<br>
>>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">
Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
><br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing
list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br><br></blockquote>
</div>
<br><br><div><br></div>
-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br><br>
Chief Executive <br><b>InternetNZ</b><br><br>
04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649
(mob)<br><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><br>
Skype: jordancarter<br><br><i>To promote the Internet's benefits and
uses, and protect its potential.</i><br><br></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br></blockquote>
</div>
<br></div>
</div>
</span>
<br><fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset><br><pre>_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community<br></blockquote></div><br></span></body></html>