<div dir="ltr"><div>Bruce,</div><div>The case addresses and touches some among many short coming in the ICANN accountability such as the status of the IRP ( binding, Non binding, Comparative study or what ?</div><div>These are the imoportant issues to be really examined analized and acted uopon.</div><div>Regards</div><div>Kavouss </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-03-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Bruce Tonkin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au" target="_blank">Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hello Alice,<br>
<span><br>
<br>
We appreciate that IRP proceedings are published.<br>
>> What we have found lacking is timely regular communication from ICANN staff and availability of a predictable schedule, which brings us back to the issue of clear timelines for each stage.<br>
<br>
</span>Yes - that is a good point. I will see what we can do in that area. The IRP is run independently of ICANN - but we can at least be asking the question, and posting the answers we receive.<br>
<br>
As you have already pointed out we need to be able to hold the providers of such dispute services accountable as well.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Regards,<br>
Bruce Tonkin<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>