Avri,<div><br></div><div>Thank you for writing this email, with which I fully agree.</div><div><br></div><div>Greg Shatan<span></span><br><br>On Sunday, March 22, 2015, Avri Doria &lt;<a href="mailto:avri@acm.org">avri@acm.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    In ICANN, we do have modifiers before Consensus.  And varying
    definitions depending on which of the SOAC or processes we are
    talking about.<br>
    <br>
    In GNSO PDP processes we talk about Full Consensus versus Consensus
    and that definiton of Consensus is not all that diffferent from the
    IETF defintion of rough consensus; though we often use polls instead
    of humming to help figure out how to continue the discussion toward
    consensus.<br>
    <br>
    The GNSO definition is different from the GAC deffintion which I
    wont presume to define.<br>
    <br>
    And in defining ICANN Consensus Policy, we have yet another
    definition  which often depends on voting thresholds.<br>
    <br>
    Personally I find it hard to talk about Consensus in ICANN without
    using modifiers of some sort.  <br>
    <br>
    As for an ICG definition of Consensus, that is beyond my pay grade
    to try and fathom.<br>
    <br>
    avri<br>
    <br>
    <div>On 22-Mar-15 20:57, Kavouss Arasteh
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Dear All,</div>
        <div> Some  relevant questions and good reply.</div>
        <div>I strongly oppose any adjustive before consensus  whether
          it is &quot; rough &quot; or &quot; Soft&quot;  or any thing else.</div>
        <div>We are CCWG and not IETF.</div>
        <div>In ICG that term even though proposed was abandonnned</div>
        <div>Pls kindly do not interpret  &quot; CONSENSUS&quot; </div>
        <div>Regards</div>
        <div>Kavouss </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2015-03-22 19:18 GMT+01:00 Rahul Sharma
          <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;wisdom.stoic@gmail.com&#39;);" target="_blank">wisdom.stoic@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">Hi Arun,
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Just thinking aloud on the substance pointer raised -
                can multistakholder model be evolved in a manner that
                ensures proportional representation in communities,
                forums, structures and Board. When I say proportional, I
                mean proportional to Internet population of the country.<br>
                <br>
                Regards,</div>
              <div>Rahul Sharma</div>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div>
                  <div>On 22 March 2015 at 15:04, Arun
                    Sukumar <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;arun.sukumar@nludelhi.ac.in&#39;);" target="_blank">arun.sukumar@nludelhi.ac.in</a>&gt;</span>
                    wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div dir="ltr">Valerie D&#39;Costa, an advisor to the
                        CCWG, raised a couple of interesting and
                        important questions on process and substance. I
                        hope this is a faithful reproduction. 
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>On process:</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>1. What should be the role of advisors?
                          Should they offer advice on the basis of
                          unanimity or &quot;rough consensus&quot;, or just
                          provide input independently? </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>2. Should advisors restrict their role to
                          responding to questions that have been flagged
                          by the CCWG and routed through the chairs? Or
                          should they/ can they flag issues they feel
                          are important - weighed from their expertise. </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>On substance:</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>1. How is the accountability process taking
                          stock of the evolving &quot;global internet
                          community&quot;, given that it is going to be
                          driven by numbers from the  developing world? </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>2. Taking off from Q1, is the CCWG
                          evaluating the future capacity of ICANN to be
                          truly representative in the years to come?</div>
                        <span><font color="#888888">
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>arun</div>
                            <div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              -- <br>
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>
                                    <div dir="ltr">-
                                      <div>@<a href="http://www.twitter.com/arunmsukumar" target="_blank">arunmsukumar</a></div>
                                      <div>Senior Fellow, <a href="http://www.ccgdelhi.org" target="_blank">Centre for
                                          Communication Governance</a></div>
                                      <div>National Law University, New
                                        Delhi</div>
                                      <div>Ph: <a href="tel:%2B91-9871943272" value="+919871943272" target="_blank">+91-9871943272</a></div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </font></span></div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <span>_______________________________________________<br>
                    Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
                    <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org&#39;);" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
                    <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
                    <br>
                  </span></blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
            <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org&#39;);" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
            <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org&#39;);" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br><br>
<hr style="border:none;color:#909090;background-color:#b0b0b0;min-height:1px;width:99%">
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;border:none">
        <tbody><tr>
                <td style="border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px">
                        <a href="http://www.avast.com/" target="_blank">
                                <img border="0" src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png">
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style="color:#3d4d5a;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;Arial&quot;,&quot;Helvetica&quot;;font-size:12pt">
                                This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
                                <br><a href="http://www.avast.com/" target="_blank">www.avast.com</a>
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</tbody></table>
<br>
</div>

</blockquote></div>