<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#330033">
    Hi,<br>
    <br>
    In ICANN, we do have modifiers before Consensus.  And varying
    definitions depending on which of the SOAC or processes we are
    talking about.<br>
    <br>
    In GNSO PDP processes we talk about Full Consensus versus Consensus
    and that definiton of Consensus is not all that diffferent from the
    IETF defintion of rough consensus; though we often use polls instead
    of humming to help figure out how to continue the discussion toward
    consensus.<br>
    <br>
    The GNSO definition is different from the GAC deffintion which I
    wont presume to define.<br>
    <br>
    And in defining ICANN Consensus Policy, we have yet another
    definition  which often depends on voting thresholds.<br>
    <br>
    Personally I find it hard to talk about Consensus in ICANN without
    using modifiers of some sort.  <br>
    <br>
    As for an ICG definition of Consensus, that is beyond my pay grade
    to try and fathom.<br>
    <br>
    avri<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22-Mar-15 20:57, Kavouss Arasteh
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CACNR4-JPvHMgUzmbpNhGrnw+HpXJzWSCe_0j3uisdvMkLk6yuQ@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Dear All,</div>
        <div> Some  relevant questions and good reply.</div>
        <div>I strongly oppose any adjustive before consensus  whether
          it is " rough " or " Soft"  or any thing else.</div>
        <div>We are CCWG and not IETF.</div>
        <div>In ICG that term even though proposed was abandonnned</div>
        <div>Pls kindly do not interpret  " CONSENSUS" </div>
        <div>Regards</div>
        <div>Kavouss </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">2015-03-22 19:18 GMT+01:00 Rahul Sharma
          <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:wisdom.stoic@gmail.com" target="_blank">wisdom.stoic@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">Hi Arun,
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Just thinking aloud on the substance pointer raised -
                can multistakholder model be evolved in a manner that
                ensures proportional representation in communities,
                forums, structures and Board. When I say proportional, I
                mean proportional to Internet population of the country.<br>
                <br>
                Regards,</div>
              <div>Rahul Sharma</div>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div>
                  <div class="h5">On 22 March 2015 at 15:04, Arun
                    Sukumar <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:arun.sukumar@nludelhi.ac.in"
                        target="_blank">arun.sukumar@nludelhi.ac.in</a>&gt;</span>
                    wrote:<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px
                  0px
0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">
                  <div>
                    <div class="h5">
                      <div dir="ltr">Valerie D'Costa, an advisor to the
                        CCWG, raised a couple of interesting and
                        important questions on process and substance. I
                        hope this is a faithful reproduction. 
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>On process:</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>1. What should be the role of advisors?
                          Should they offer advice on the basis of
                          unanimity or "rough consensus", or just
                          provide input independently? </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>2. Should advisors restrict their role to
                          responding to questions that have been flagged
                          by the CCWG and routed through the chairs? Or
                          should they/ can they flag issues they feel
                          are important - weighed from their expertise. </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>On substance:</div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>1. How is the accountability process taking
                          stock of the evolving "global internet
                          community", given that it is going to be
                          driven by numbers from the  developing world? </div>
                        <div><br>
                        </div>
                        <div>2. Taking off from Q1, is the CCWG
                          evaluating the future capacity of ICANN to be
                          truly representative in the years to come?</div>
                        <span><font color="#888888">
                            <div><br>
                            </div>
                            <div>arun</div>
                            <div>
                              <div><br>
                              </div>
                              -- <br>
                              <div>
                                <div dir="ltr">
                                  <div>
                                    <div dir="ltr">-
                                      <div>@<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                                          href="http://www.twitter.com/arunmsukumar"
                                          target="_blank">arunmsukumar</a></div>
                                      <div>Senior Fellow, <a
                                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                                          href="http://www.ccgdelhi.org"
                                          target="_blank">Centre for
                                          Communication Governance</a></div>
                                      <div>National Law University, New
                                        Delhi</div>
                                      <div>Ph: <a
                                          moz-do-not-send="true"
                                          href="tel:%2B91-9871943272"
                                          target="_blank"
                                          value="+919871943272">+91-9871943272</a></div>
                                    </div>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </font></span></div>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <span>_______________________________________________<br>
                    Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org"
                      target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
                      target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
                    <br>
                  </span></blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
              target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  
<br /><br />
<hr style='border:none; color:#909090; background-color:#B0B0B0; height: 1px; width: 99%;' />
<table style='border-collapse:collapse;border:none;'>
        <tr>
                <td style='border:none;padding:0px 15px 0px 8px'>
                        <a href="http://www.avast.com/">
                                <img border=0 src="http://static.avast.com/emails/avast-mail-stamp.png" />
                        </a>
                </td>
                <td>
                        <p style='color:#3d4d5a; font-family:"Calibri","Verdana","Arial","Helvetica"; font-size:12pt;'>
                                This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
                                <br><a href="http://www.avast.com/">www.avast.com</a>
                        </p>
                </td>
        </tr>
</table>
<br />
</body>
</html>