<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Generally speaking, "staff driven" means to the community "thoroughly discredited", never mind that aspirations from staff are just that, asprirations.</div><div><br></div><div>I do not wonder how this slipped past the Board, it probably probably was part of the consent agenda, but the sheer audacity of it makes it belong to CCWG-Accountability, by default.</div><div><br></div><div>Substance can of course be discussed at IG or wherever, as well.</div><div><br></div><div>el</div><div>-- <div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13pt; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.294118); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373);">Sent from </span><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Dr Lisse's iPhone 6</span></div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Mar 30, 2015, at 15:37, Marilyn Cade <<a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div>Adding the endorsement of NetMundial principles to the Strat Plan is staff driven, not yet fully supported by the ICANN community. this should be referred to the CCWG-IG, not debated in either IANA or Accountability WGs. We should consider this aspirational on the part of ICANN staff. </div><div><br></div><div>I appreciate your pointing this out, Rahul. </div><div><br></div><div><br><br>Sent from my iPad</div><div><br>On Mar 29, 2015, at 10:20 PM, Rahul Sharma <<a href="mailto:wisdom.stoic@gmail.com">wisdom.stoic@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2016-2020-10oct14-en.pdf">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/strategic-plan-2016-2020-10oct14-en.pdf</a> <br><br>Page 22, Section 4.3 Participate in the evolution of a global, trusted, inclusive multistakeholder
Internet governance ecosystem that addresses Internet issues.<br><br>One of the key success factors says:<div><br>Demonstrate leadership by implementing best practices in
multistakeholder mechanisms within the distributed Internet
governance ecosystem while <b><u>encouraging all stakeholders to
implement the principles endorsed at NETmundial</u></b>.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Related questions:</div><div><br></div><div><ol><li>Should a body like ICANN define and adopt Internet Principles it believes in, for its policy, strategy and operations? <br><br></li><li>Are group members aware whether endorsement of NETmundial principles is through a public consultation process involving community or an internal ICANN decision? Is this a matter that this group working on ICANN Accountability should discuss?<br><br></li></ol></div><div>Kind Regards,</div><div>Rahul Sharma</div></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>