<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Dr. Lisse (or should I be addressing the Co-Chairs?)</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Of course I've seen your emails regarding your "objection," and I have responded to them, constructively. And you know that, as you have responded to me in that thread. I'm sorry that your memory has failed you in that instance.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Saying that you "disagree with the summary" in no way conveys any relationship or relevance to your objections to the work plan. It's an entirely opaque statement. At least now you have conveyed that it is linked, in some apparently inexpressible way to your "objection". I thought you might have had some specific disagreement with the summary itself, which might have been illuminating. I see that is not the case, so there's nothing further I need to know.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Thank you for your reply (or rather your email to the Co-Chairs, since you chose not to reply to my direct question, for reasons unbeknownst to me).</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Best regards,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg Shatan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Dear Co-Chairs,</div><div><br></div><div>iI am wondering if the gentleman has not been receiving the emails from Roelof, Tijani, Alice, the two GAC reps and myself, with the word objection in the subject line?</div><span class=""><div><br></div><div>el</div><div><br>-- <div>Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini</div></div></span><span class=""><div><br>On Apr 13, 2015, at 17:09, Greg Shatan <<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com" target="_blank">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div></span><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class=""><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Would you care to elaborate on the specific disagreement(s)?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div></span><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><span class=""><div>Just so that we get this on the record, I disagree with the summary of the two CCWG co-Chairs provided to the CWG. </div><div><br></div></span><div>el<br>[...]</div></div></blockquote></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>