<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Would you care to elaborate on the specific disagreement(s)?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div>Just so that we get this on the record, I disagree with the summary of the two CCWG co-Chairs provided to the CWG. </div><div><br></div><div>el<br><br>-- <div>Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini</div></div><span class=""><div><br>On Apr 13, 2015, at 16:23, Mathieu Weill <<a href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr" target="_blank">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>> wrote:<br><br></div></span><blockquote type="cite"><div><span class="">
Dear Colleagues,<br>
<br>
As you may know, the CWG has started today an intense work period of
2 days. You will find the notes of the 1st session below. Thomas and
I were invited to provide an update on the CCWG. <br>
<br>
You will also note that the CWG puts emphasis on their expectations
towards our work. We can expect a consolidation of these
requirements to be sent to us shortly after their 2 days of work. <br>
<br>
For illustration purposes, the first session already addressed :<br>
- budget requirement <br>
</span><div><span class="">
<blockquote type="cite"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Statement
for CCWG</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">:
We support the idea of budget veto tool, and we need CCWG to
deliver on this. Budget should include itemization of all IANA
operations costs to project level and below as needed. </span></blockquote>
- ccTLD delegation appeals<br>
<blockquote type="cite"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Statement
for CCWG</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">:
For ccTLDs, the CCWG should be mindful of the DT-B survey
results and recommendations that ccTLDs may decide to develop
their own appeals mechanism regarding re/delegation at a later
date (it is not required as part of the transition proposal). </span></blockquote>
- also mention of a periodic review of IANA performance <br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span><span></span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">These
reviews would be similar to the AOC reviews. </span></blockquote>
<br>
Best<br>
Mathieu<br>
<br>
-------- Message transféré --------
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap valign="BASELINE">Sujet :
</th>
<td>[CWG-Stewardship] Notes, Recordings, Transcript CWG IANA
Meeting #35 - 13 April</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap valign="BASELINE">Date : </th>
<td>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:47:01 +0000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap valign="BASELINE">De : </th>
<td>Brenda Brewer <a href="mailto:brenda.brewer@icann.org" target="_blank"><brenda.brewer@icann.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" nowrap valign="BASELINE">Pour : </th>
<td><a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank">cwg-stewardship@icann.org</a>
<a href="mailto:cwg-stewardship@icann.org" target="_blank"><cwg-stewardship@icann.org></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
</span><mime-attachment.gif>
<div><div class="h5"><div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">Dear
all, <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext">The
notes, recordings and transcripts for the CWG IANA Meeting
#35 on 13 April are available here: </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"><a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52896576" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52896576</a><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<h2 style="margin-top:22.5pt;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Action
Items</span></b><span style="font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></h2>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue">Action (staff):
edit DT-N text to reflect "no more than 5 years" language</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> </span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<h2 style="margin-top:22.5pt;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Notes</span></b><span style="font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></h2>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> <strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">1.
Opening Remarks </span></strong><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Welcome
-- chairs are co-located in ICANN Brussels office for two
days.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">6
sessions in high intensity meeting: structural discussions
with Sidley and functional/operational discussion with DTs. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Convergence
of views is critical. Amazing work and coordination in
Istanbul. Let's retain that spirit. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Need
to develop and work on relationship with CCWG-Acct. Both
groups (CWG and CCWG) use Sidley Austin as legal counsel.
Need to further refine the list of
requirements/recommendations for CCWG. They are aware of the
time pressure we are under, and that they are thus under as
well.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">There
was a request to move DT-A to meeting #36, and we have
therefore pushed up discussion on DT-N. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> 4
areas of input for CCWG-Acct: <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">ICANN
budget (in particular, the requirement for transparency
around cost allocation in relation to the IANA functions)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Community
empowerment mechanisms (in particular, relating to a
confidence vote option)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Review
and redress mechanisms (in particular, relating to a
'fundamental bylaw' mechanism)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Appeal
mechanisms (especially with regard to ccTLD related issues)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">The
CCWG-Acct Chairs of the will do a recap today of where
things stand from their end. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> <strong><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif">2.
CCWG-Accountability Update</span></strong><span><b> </b></span>(Thomas
Rickert and Mathieu Weill) <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">The
group has been further developing its building blocks for
the accountability framework. Some of the elements being
looked at include Board recall, independent review panel,
inclusion of periodic review in the bylaws. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">CCWG
has a vision for the advanced accountability infrastructure
and CCWG is working with two firms to see how the
requirements can be implemented under CA law. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">CCWG
is considering dividing WS1 into two areas of focus. First
priority would be the CWG requirements. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">If
there could be a list of items elaborated from the 4 areas
of input, that would be useful to CCWG. Also useful to have
use cases for testing. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">All
26 CCWG-Acct stress tests appear to satisfy the work/vision
of the CCWG-Acct. Some have been identified already as
relating to the CWG. Work is ongoing and satisfactory for
now. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Wiki
link:<span> </span><a href="https://community.icann.org/x/UAEdAw" target="_blank"><span style="color:#3b73af">https://community.icann.org/x/UAEdAw</span></a> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">3.
DT-O (budget)</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">DT-O
worked quickly and closely and had assistance from Xavier
Calvez<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Explanation
for recommendation 2: ICANN does not capture its costs on a
functional basis. ICANN's Finance team has provided an
itemization for FY15. Doing this for FY16 is not possible
yet, because the CWG hasn't decided on a structure.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Annex
X suggests items to be addressed in the future. These are
items that would need to be reviewed once there is clarity
on what the CWG proposes as a solution. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">No
disagreement with DT-O recommendations<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">CCWG
is looking at a budget veto -- is this a dependency that
needs to be addressed with the CCWG? <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Who
should be consulted as part of the budget process for IANA?
Question to consider as we develop the rest of CWG proposal<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">If
there was a veto for IANA aspects, who gets to exercise the
veto?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">The
CCWG is providing the community with the tools. We need the
community veto tool<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Statement
for CCWG</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">:
We support the idea of budget veto tool, and we need CCWG to
deliver on this. Budget should include itemization of all
IANA operations costs to project level and below as needed. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">4.
DT-B (ccTLD appeals)</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Dealing
with question of whether or not there was a need for a ccTLD
appeals mechanism<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Survey
closed on 3 April (only 28 responses were received)<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Low
response rate would not allow mandate for CWG to proceed
with designing an appeals mechanism now. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">So
recommendation is to not pursue this now<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">The
ccTLDs may decide to develop their own appeals mechanism
regarding re/delegation at a later date. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">For
gTLDs, are the appeals provisions already? Only if there is
an agreement. If a gTLD is not delegated, then there is no
agreement and provisions to rely on. However, since this is
a policy issue, it may not be appropriate for the CWG to
require this of the CCWG. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Statement
for CCWG</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">:
For ccTLDs, the CCWG should be mindful of the DT-B survey
results and recommendations that ccTLDs may decide to
develop their own appeals mechanism regarding re/delegation
at a later date (it is not required as part of the
transition proposal). <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">5.
DT-N (Periodic Review)</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">These
reviews would be similar to the AOC reviews. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">First
review after 2 years, and then every 5 years after that<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Are
there other cases that could trigger reviews (other than the
calendar? The CSC should be able to trigger a review after
an emergency has been dealt with <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">The
periodic review could initiate a RFP is review results
indicated that this was a necessary next step. Is this
something that the CWG thinks is in scope? Yes, but perhaps
a question for public comment<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Does
the review expand to address IANA policy?<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:0in;background:white"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Symbol;color:#333333"><span>·<span style="font:7.0pt "Times New Roman""> </span></span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Suggest
language "no more than 5 years" for the review period. <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:22.5pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue">Action</span></strong><span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue"> </span></span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue">(staff):
edit DT-N text to reflect "no more than 5 years" language</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"> <u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">6.
AOB</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p style="margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:0in;margin-left:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;background:white;text-align:start;word-spacing:0px"><strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">7.
Closing Remarks</span></strong><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333"><u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
</div>
<br>
</div></div></div>
<br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><Portion de message joint></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br></div></blockquote></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>