<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name="Microsoft Theme 2.00" content="Arctic 011"><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
h1
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 1 Char";
margin-top:12.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:16.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:bold;}
h2
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 2 Char";
margin-top:2.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:14.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;}
h3
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 3 Char";
margin-top:2.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:13.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;}
h4
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 4 Char";
margin-top:2.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:14.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;}
h5
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 5 Char";
margin-top:2.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:13.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;}
h6
{mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 6 Char";
margin-top:2.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
page-break-after:avoid;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:normal;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#9D454F;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#814E95;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
span.Heading1Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 1 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 1";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;
font-weight:bold;}
span.Heading2Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 2 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 2";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.Heading3Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 3 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 3";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.Heading4Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 4 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 4";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.Heading5Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 5 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 5";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.Heading6Char
{mso-style-name:"Heading 6 Char";
mso-style-priority:9;
mso-style-link:"Heading 6";
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#262626;}
span.EmailStyle25
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle26
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.apple-converted-space
{mso-style-name:apple-converted-space;}
span.EmailStyle28
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle29
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle30
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle32
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white background="cid:image001.gif@01D03418.3BC26740" lang=EN-US link="#9D454F" vlink="#814E95"><img src="cid:image001.gif@01D03418.3BC26740" v:src="cid:image001.gif@01D03418.3BC26740" v:shapes="_x0000_Mail" width=0 height=0 class=shape style='display:none;width:0;height:0'><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<v:background id="_x0000_s1025" o:bwmode="white" o:targetscreensize="1024,768">
<v:fill src="cid:image001.gif@01D03418.3BC26740" o:title="background_arctic" type="frame" />
</v:background></xml><![endif]--><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>Dear all, <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext'>The notes, recordings and transcripts for the <b>Accountability WP1 Meeting #10 </b>on 15 April will be available </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>here: </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#262626'> </span><span style='font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1F497D'><a href="https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895958">https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=52895958</a></span><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:22.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Action Items<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue'>Action: Avri Doria to write a short explanation</span></b><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:22.5pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:15.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Notes<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Accountability WP1 Meeting #10 on 15 April.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Links: WP1 Drafts - <a href="http://tinyurl.com/puvneyq"><span style='color:blue;text-decoration:none'>http://tinyurl.com/puvneyq</span></a><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>These high-level notes are designed to help you navigate through content of the call and do not substitute in any way the transcript.</span></i><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>About the agenda: legal document with WP2 template and legal advice on<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>some. CCWG Tuesday a presentation by the lawyers on powers and<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>mechanisms. Some questions not asked, and clear in the call that the CCWG<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>is far from agreement as to the mechanisms to choose. So WP1 is not close<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>to recommending a mechanisms by Friday. On the co-chair coordination,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>need the debate in the CCWG to have the discussion about mechanisms next<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>week. WP1 discussed Q&A items, to ask q of the lawyers, and WP1 written<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>questions will be forwarded. So when we have the meetings next week, we<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>are all in a better position to refine down to critical points and the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>mechanisms.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Not a decision making call. To talk about the issues with the lawyers.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>To debate with the fill CCWG next week.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>40 minutes.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Followed by review of the 3rd draft "CCWG-ACCT Working Party 1: Community<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Empowerment Input for First Public Comment Report"<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>2. Q&A with Counsel on the "Mechanism" debate<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Question: different advantages/disadvantages of the designator model and<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>the membership model. Strongest reason to select and drawback to each<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>model.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Advantage of membership is also the weakness. Statutory framework of<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>rights in the corporation code. Members are given rights under bylaws or<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>statute that cannot be given to designators. Some rights are those the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>CCWG wants. They are provided in the statute.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>The downside is the extensive framework of statutory rights that should be<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>built into the bylaws, protections and rights. There is a lot of<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>procedure and detail in the bylaws<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Advantage of designator is ignoring all of that. And disadvantage is that<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>corporate law does not give rights that re available in the statute. To<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>make those rights available, have to look to contact.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>CA corporations code allows any provision in the bylaws that you want for<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>internal governance, that is not prohibited by law. If there are<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>procedures you want to follow (reconsideration etc) can be out in, so long<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>as not illegal. And what happens with enforce-ability. What happens if<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>someone (the board) decides not to follow within the system, may have a<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>harder time to respond in the designator system than the member system.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>If the SO/AC become members, are the liable. If GNSO designed a gTLD<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>designed a policy that everyone thought silly and cause companies to loose<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>millions $$$ could the GSNO be sued for this?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>CA law requires legal persons. For the designator model. legal advice is<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>the designators be legal persons, or there'd be no means to legally<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>enforce bylaws etc. This has worked for ICANN, perhaps we don't care? But<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>having legal persons does also bring complications. So unincorporated<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>associations are recommended for designators and members. And in member<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>model the law says members are persons. If not legal persons then they<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>only exist inside ICANN. So there is no legal recourse.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>They have the right to contract and the right to sue, and the burden of<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>being sued. But the unincorporated associations have no "blood" no value.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'> The unincorporated associations only can be sued, the participants are<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>not liable.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>(Agreement from legal advisor)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Freedom from lawsuit. Believe forming as unincorporated associations<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>should not cause liability, and can protect the participants. They don't<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>have assets. Crazy people might file lawsuits but expect those to be<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>thrown out pretty quickly.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Legal advisors do not think this is a significant concern.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Q. Members and designators. GNSO made up of 4 distinct and different<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>parts, unlikely to come to agreement on any issue. GNSO needs 4 distinct<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>votes, weighted. Is this legally doable?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>In a member structure, members of different classes could be given<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>different votes, quarters, or 4 votes, etc. In the designator structure,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>each would appoint their own Directors. It’s the internal structures that<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>would elect the same number directors. Second pathway, the same<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>mechanisms as used to select the GNSO director could be how you vote as a<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>designator or a member.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Q. Designing a mechanism to induce the Board to consider, and what such a<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>mechanism might look like. Advice that is received but not acted on. How<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>to cause board action.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Mechanisms to force a consideration by the board. in the member or<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>designator structure could design a structure to whenever the member or<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>designator petition the board for a hearing they get a hearing. A<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>convening power to the community.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. if we get that mechanism, can the board then be forced to respond in<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>such a way that can then be subjected to review, for example a triggering<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>of a review mechanism.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>The outcome of the convened meeting has 3 results: do the thing people<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>want, not do the thing, not take a decision. And those could be triggers<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>for an IRP. A little easier with membership, but probably work around<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>with the designators, not aware of the problem.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. NomCom. Would need to be a legal entity. Question, how to remove a<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>directors appointed by the NomCom, could this only be done by a NomCom.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Under the designator system only be removed by that entity. So under the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>designator system would need to be created as a legal person, restructured<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>in some way. Under the member system, can mix designators, and NomCom<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>could be organized as a designator in a member organized system.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. Designator model, contractual arrangements can make the designator<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>model respond to the major requirements of the CCWG?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. if no additional measures to the designator model, what can we do an<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>not do?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Under designator system they cannot be given powers around budget and<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>strategy, and also certain decisions around a review process. What is the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>minimum: even if you decide to maintain a designator system lead advice if<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>the designators are organized as legal persons, to provide protection<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>against liability, a shield, and in the future if needed, they would have<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>standing to enforce their rights.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. putting the membership into place would be more complicated and take longer?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Not considerably more complex. The way currently organized into groups<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>that are like members. The member structure relies on some more subtle<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>areas of law. But not a radical change from the designator structure.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Look at discrete member rights and say not so complex, but in CA there are<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>elaborate members requirements, notice requirements, inspection rights,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>etc., that make it more complicated to implement.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>(fro chat) I would like to clarify. I think for member corporation, as<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Ingrid said, the complexity is in the rights and statutory framework. I<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Think with designators, the complexity is in designing the contractual<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>arrangements. So I would say they are both complex, but perhaps in<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>different ways.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>q. legal sub-team, ask for questions in writing, what happens to those<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>questions: what steps?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Questions are reviewed by the legal sub-team, not all are sent.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Questions are sent through, or they are collated and sent to counsel.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>label any question for counsel, and break out questions from long threads.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>4. Public Comment Document content<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Review the document part by part.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Comment: 6.5.2 Power to reject budget/strategy. Suggest the title should<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>include reconsideration, the board should be given that option. Rejection<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>comes later. Correct the inconsistency.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Response: In each situation described, there is a reconsider requirement<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>while there is a block of execution going on.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Global public interest. What re the criteria for that? What are the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>ICANN stakeholders.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>page 3, 2nd power. Change adopted to approved, and these are suggested<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>global changes for the document.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Ratios: 50%, 60% subsequent rejection: suggest higher for what an extreme<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>measures, raise by 10% - 15%.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Question, should these ratios should considered in comparison with the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>other powers and the importance of other powers?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Think of the rights of members of an organization usually in terms of<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>approval of the budget. issues of detail. Is it a positive right to<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>approve or a negative right to object?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>But this will not be a process of the community coming in to approve, it<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>will only occur when the community has an issue with the board's actions.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>6.5.3 increased threshold for the right to object. Title should also<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>match content (as with 6.5.2.)<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Fundamental and non-fundamental bylaws. Which are the fundamental bylaws.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Timeline of 2 weeks to short, and threshold is too low.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Timeline for bylaws change already require a public comment, the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>additional time is not so long as it will have been extensively publicly discussed.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>How to distinguish between fundamental bylaws? We propose what they are,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>and these come from WP2. Mink around core mission and values. And will<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>be visible what they are. WP2 will identify them and describe why they<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>merit protections.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Fundamental bylaws tend to go to the core of corporation, and those being<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>suggested seem to do that. And they would be clearly set out that they<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>had different mechanisms for change etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Who can change or propose changes to fundamental bylaws. ATRT and other<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>review teams have suggested bylaws changes. Believe SO/AC can recommend to<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>the Board to make bylaws changes, but it is a Board mechanism. And the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Board on its own initiative can move to amend bylaws. Does this with the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>2/3 majority. Anticipate changes to fundamental bylaws would be higher.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>6.5.5. recalling individual directors<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Removal of the NomCom appointed directors. Is the IETF model one to<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>consider? Threshold: 40%, concern too low. Recall methods within stakeholder groups.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>escalation mechanism: not suggesting the NomCom is the body to remove a<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>director, but suggesting that there should be a way to remove them through<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>a community mechanism. Consideration that it is not appropriate for the<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>NomCom to be the remover. As yet we don't know the mechanism.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Threshold: for now, that it should be the majority of the community, but to be discussed on the full CCWG<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>IETF model:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Petition to assemble a recall NomCom. Same rules of the regular NomCom,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>but is single issue. Decide on the 75% basis to remove or not.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Offer to draft the analogous procedures.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:blue'>Action: Avri Doria to write a short explanation.</span><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>5. Agenda for Next Call<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Paper is the sole subject of the next call.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Jordan will add comments to Ver 3 of the document.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>Next call will pick up at the end of 6.5.5.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-top:7.5pt;mso-line-height-alt:10.0pt;background:white'><span style='font-size:10.5pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333'>19:00 UTC Thursday April 16.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>