<div dir="ltr"><div>+1 as well but if the CCWG requirements can be achieved in other ways, it will be good to hear it. The designator route i understand does not require entity incorporation, may be good to further explore that route.<br><br></div><div>It may also be good to hear specific suggestions on alternatives from those who think a particular option cannot work<br></div><div><br></div>Cheers!</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Roelof Meijer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl" target="_blank">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div><span class="">
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:medium">>Unless EACH and EVERY ccTLD Manager formally joins such organization</span><br style="font-family:Calibri">
<span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:medium">>such organization will not have any standing. At all.</span></div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:medium"><br>
</span></div>
</span><div>I have to disagree. In the situation that the conscious decision of a ccTLD manager NOT to be a member is the sole reason for that manager not being a member</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Best,</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Roelof</font></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<br>
</div>
<span style="color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px">
<div style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt;text-align:left;color:black;BORDER-BOTTOM:medium none;BORDER-LEFT:medium none;PADDING-BOTTOM:0in;PADDING-LEFT:0in;PADDING-RIGHT:0in;BORDER-TOP:#b5c4df 1pt solid;BORDER-RIGHT:medium none;PADDING-TOP:3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Jordan Carter <<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>dinsdag 21 april 2015 20:32<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Legal question<br>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Hi all:<br>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 21 April 2015 at 23:25, Dr Eberhard Lisse <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na" target="_blank">el@lisse.na</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Dear Co-Chairs,<br>
<br>
could you please explain to the gentleman from the IPC that it is NOT<br>
possible for ccTLD Managers, whether they are members of the ccNSO or<br>
not to become a "member organization" (as we are discussing here).<br>
<br>
Unless EACH and EVERY ccTLD Manager formally joins such organization<br>
such organization will not have any standing. At all.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is clearly not accurate. If this argument had any legs, then the same could be said of the ccNSO.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>ccTLD managers participate in ICANN through the ccNSO and would do through a community mechanism that involved membership in order to deal with ICANN and global policies, such as they are - not to manage the bilateral relationships Eberbard mentions below.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>On Chris's broader point, he has been involved with the ccNSO since before it was formed and I have not. I do not understand the aversion he alleges in respect of memberships. I know things are pretty different in 2015 to what they were in 1998.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think our job is to set up a clear and coherent framework for ccTLDs along with the rest of the community to consider, and our job too is to explain clearly what such a model (including any options) would ACTUALLY as opposed to on a FUD basis, offer
to and require of members/designators or classes of members/designators -- including any issues with associations etc.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If ccTLD managers chose as a group to not participate in a scheme that was workable, and thereby prevented meaningful accountability reforms in ICANN, then they would be putting the IANA stewardship transition at risk. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I don't think they'd to that lightly. But I do think that however unlikely, the fact this could happen ( due to our non-contracted status, in the end we ccs have the choice) does mean that the doctrine of organisational and institutional conservatism is
very important.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Which is why I am glad to see Chris's questions assigned to the counsel, and why I look forward to their response.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>cheers</div>
<div>Jordan</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
ccTLD Managers have a bilateral relationship with ICANN, if at all and<br>
this we MUST establish, as per my numerous requests.<br>
<br>
This is similar to the GAC, I really don't think that it will be even<br>
possible, unless by Multilateral Treaty between all states participating.<br>
<br>
But even if it happened, the very nature of how governments make<br>
decisions in international fora (very, very few governments allow other<br>
governments to "speak for", or commit it to something, on principle),<br>
make this unwieldy and unlikely.<br>
<br>
greetings, el<br>
<span><br>
On 2015-04-21 08:35, Greg Shatan wrote:<br>
> Chris,<br>
><br>
> The simple answer is that the SOACs as currently configured are not<br>
> a very good vehicle for many of the enhanced powers we seek. Once you<br>
> make them into members and give them legal personhood everything else<br>
> becomes much easier.<br>
><br>
> However, you assumed no change to the SOACs, which made the answers much<br>
> harder.<br>
><br>
> Greg<br>
><br>
> On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Chris Disspain <<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au" target="_blank">ceo@auda.org.au</a><br>
</span><span>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au" target="_blank">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Greg, All,<br>
><br>
> With respect, I think we are overcomplicating the issue. I simply<br>
> want to gain a base line for the discussion about any changes<br>
> necessary to achieve what we want. We agreed on jurisdiction that<br>
> if we can get acceptable escalations and remedies without changing<br>
> jurisdiction then we should leave well alone for now, I think we<br>
> should apply the same principle here. I am clear what the lawyers<br>
> recommend we do BUT I am not clear about what we can do or what<br>
> compromises we need to make if we were to maintain the current<br>
> structure. I think that is a key part of our deliberations.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> Cheers,<br>
><br>
><br>
> Chris<br>
</span>[..]<br>
<span><font color="#888888">--<br>
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)<br>
<a href="mailto:el@lisse.NA" target="_blank">el@lisse.NA</a> / * | Telephone: <a href="tel:%2B264%2081%20124%206733" value="+264811246733" target="_blank">
+264 81 124 6733</a> (cell)<br>
PO Box 8421 \ /<br>
Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/<br>
</font></span>
<div>
<div>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br>
<br>
Chief Executive <br>
<b>InternetNZ</b><br>
<br>
04 495 2118 (office) | <a href="tel:%2B64%2021%20442%20649" value="+6421442649" target="_blank">+64 21 442 649</a> (mob)<br>
<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><br>
Skype: jordancarter<br>
<br>
<i>A better world through a better Internet </i><br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></span>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">------------------------------------------------------------------------<br><font color="#888888"><blockquote style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;font-family:garamond,serif">
<i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Seun Ojedeji,<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Federal University Oye-Ekiti<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">web: </span><a href="http://www.fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">http://www.fuoye.edu.ng</a><br>
<span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Mobile: <a value="+2348035233535">+2348035233535</a></span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><br></i><i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">alt email:<a href="http://goog_1872880453" target="_blank"> </a><a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng</a></span></i><br><br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The key to understanding is humility - my view !<br></blockquote></blockquote></font><br></div></div>
</div>