<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Jacob,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Thank you for bringing this up. Some very independent thinking from the Independent Review Panel.... Overruling the Bylaws! Who knew that was even possible?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jacob Malthouse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jacob@bigroom.ca" target="_blank">jacob@bigroom.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Dear All, <div><br></div><div>Head's up that there are some significant recent IRP updates on the .africa case showing substantial differences of view on how the process should be conducted:</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/dca-v-icann-2013-12-11-en" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/dca-v-icann-2013-12-11-en</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>The implications may be worth considering in how the RfR/IRP process is developed and stress-tested, notably in regard to witness statements and in-person hearings. </div><div><br></div><div>Best regards, </div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Jacob. </div><div>
</div></font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>