<p dir="ltr">Kavouss et AL</p>
<p dir="ltr">Extremely important totally agree. The remainder of the report will hang on that or be hung is not righted.<br>
RD <br><br><br></p>
<p dir="ltr">On May 2, 2015 3:36 AM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> IMPORTANT AND URGENT<br>
><br>
> Dear co-chairs,<br>
><br>
> Thank you very much for your enormous and tireless efforts to put this doc. for final comments<br>
><br>
> I have had many comments but I could not finish the edits till now.<br>
><br>
> I therefore do not wish to delay the work.<br>
><br>
> However, I have one VERY IMPORTANT edit that I raised it in my last e-mail.<br>
><br>
> That edit is relating to a reference to ICANN or Internet Process as being «private led multistakeholder” organization or process.<br>
><br>
> This is a mistake. a big mistake. There is no such preference to one category of stakeholder over other categories of stakeholder (private or public) .<br>
><br>
> I raised this matter at one of our call and asked for deletion of that term.<br>
><br>
> All stakeholder, irrespective being private, public, and etc. SHALL be treated equally. This issue was raised at various occasions by NTIA indicating / emphasizing that no single category of the stakeholder should benefit from preference over other categories of stakeholders .This term was used at very early stage of the introduction of the ICANN into the business. Over the time when we discussed that the process should be inclusive, democratic, then it was agreed by everybody that no category of the stakeholder should have any preference, what so ever, or should have a preferred treatment over other categories of the stakeholders.<br>
><br>
> In view of the above, I urge you to kindly correct such a big mistake which if it is not corrected would put us in a very delicate situation that we did not respect impartiality and neutrality in treating various categories of the stakeholders.<br>
><br>
> There are 4 or 5 times that such a reference to »private led multistakeholder are referred to in the doc.<br>
><br>
> Pls kindly make a simple «find" check and delete all that. Term in other part of doc. whenever, so as reference is maded to multistakeholder there is no such an incorrect and discriminative preference.<br>
><br>
> Regards<br>
><br>
> Kavouss<br>
><br>
><br>
> 2015-05-02 9:01 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
>><br>
>> Dear All,<br>
>> I have not finish edits .I am on page 50. However, in view of time time constrain, I have an important edit that is attached.<br>
>> The same edit should be carried forward elsewhere throughout the entire document . please then search for " private sector led " and DELETE THAT . I mentioned in one of the call .See Attached doc.<br>
>> Regards<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> 2015-05-02 3:34 GMT+02:00 Samantha Eisner <<a href="mailto:Samantha.Eisner@icann.org">Samantha.Eisner@icann.org</a>>:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thanks Grace. <br>
>>><br>
>>> Dear CCWG, <br>
>>> Attached please find some proposed edits for consideration.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Best, <br>
>>><br>
>>> Sam<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 3:52 PM<br>
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Edits due in 3h: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC<br>
>>><br>
>>> Hi all, <br>
>>> Just a reminder than edits, comments are due in approximately 3h. Thank you to those who sent edits earlier today. If you must send late edits, please send a note to the Chairs with staff in copy to give us notice that your comments will be delayed. Best to stick to the deadline, but we know everyone is working hard to get this draft report ready, and we’d rather get your comments than not at all.<br>
>>> Have a good weekend, <br>
>>> Grace<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM<br>
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Subject: Re: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC<br>
>>><br>
>>> Dear all, <br>
>>><br>
>>> We sent the V10 draft report earlier today (in UTC) but have been notified that, in some cases, the files are too large to download from the email attachments. As a reminder, the draft (redline and clean versions) are posted on the Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Draft+Report">https://community.icann.org/display/acctcrosscomm/Draft+Report</a>. <br>
>>><br>
>>> Looking forward to receiving your comments and edits,<br>
>>> Grace<br>
>>><br>
>>> From: Grace Abuhamad <<a href="mailto:grace.abuhamad@icann.org">grace.abuhamad@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Date: Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 9:22 PM<br>
>>> To: Accountability Cross Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
>>> Subject: V10 DRAFT for your review by 2 May at 01:00 UTC<br>
>>><br>
>>> Dear all, <br>
>>><br>
>>> Here attached is the CCWG-Accountability Draft Report V10. I have attached a redline and a clean version (in Word and PDF). <br>
>>><br>
>>> Version 10 incorporates the following: <br>
>>> Changes from the CCWG-Accountability call on Thursday 30 April at 05:00 UTC<br>
>>> Edits from legal counsel (Sidley and Adler)<br>
>>> Approval from the CWG-Stewardship Chairs/Client Committee regarding incorporation of CWG-Stewardship recommendations<br>
>>> Edits from Chairs and Rapporteurs <br>
>>> Please send your edits, comments, etc to the mailing list bySaturday 2 May 01:00 UTC (24h from now). Staff will incorporate the edits over the weekend so as to release a final version for Public Comment on Monday, 4 May. If possible, edits are appreciate in track changes in the clean version so that they are clearly marked and visible. There will be professional formatting and copyediting done before publication, so we suggest that your time my be best spent by focusing on the substance-related edits. <br>
>>><br>
>>> Also, please remember to submit your feedback regarding the XPlane graphics by Saturday as well. Adam will send a reminder re: XPlane. <br>
>>><br>
>>> Almost there!<br>
>>> — Grace <br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
><br>
</p>