<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>Dear co-chairs,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I am not sure that just adding an extra hour to the call would really help us to work with the comments in an effective and –if at all possible- efficient way.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I sent the following suggesting to Jordan trough the WP1 list:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>I suggest that the first exercise that some of us as a sub-team do, is categorize the comments. Possible categories: comments on mechanisms, comments on powers, comments on (AoC in) bylaws etc. And that we then assign a category or multiple categories
to subteams to do both the analysis and the initial thinking of a way forward. In this way, not all of us will have to go through all the comments, we can do a lot of work in a relatively short timespan and if the subteams present at the F2F sessions, those
can be quite effective.</div>
<div>How does that sound?</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Groet,</font></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Roelof</font></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Alice Jansen <<a href="mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org">alice.jansen@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>woensdag 20 mei 2015 17:19<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>"<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[CCWG-ACCT] June 9 Call - On behalf of CCWG Cochairs<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div><u>On behalf of CCWG Cochairs</u></div>
<div><u><br>
</u></div>
<div>
<div>Dear all,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Following up on the suggestion made on call #33 that the full Group should review public comments received on a call, we would like to suggest dedicating the CCWG call scheduled for Tuesday, 9 June to this task.</div>
<div>This call will be an opportunity for us to identify sections of the draft proposal where the community 1) is in agreement; 2) needs clarification; 3) has diverging opinions.</div>
<div>To provide us with sufficient time to review all comments, we have decided to extend the call duration to three hours. Staff will adjust the calendar invite accordingly.</div>
<div>As a reminder, public comments received to date can be found at: <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-04may15">
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-draft-proposal-04may15</a>/ </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best regards</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<div>Mathieu, Thomas, León</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>