<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Wednesday 03 June 2015 11:31 AM,
      Jordan Carter wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAK2bTy-psD6vMdrKve0Wq7tsapXP7oWypwaACRFWO1EwfEEBuA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">hi all, hi Alan
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>First question - is this a CCWG issue or a CWG one?<br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <div>Some other questions...</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>What would happen to these funds where the PTI's
          performance meant that the IANA functions were given to
          another entity?</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Are we seriously considering the possibility that ICANN gets
    distraught with an entity fully controlled by itself and decides to
    allocate IANA functions to another entity not controlled by
    itself... This is most amusing? Do we not have better things to
    consider - perhaps something like what happens when US courts force
    US law and public policy conceptions on ICANN decisions and what
    mockery it makes of ICANN as a global governance body, a situation
    so imminent in one way or the other that is would be quite safe to
    place a bet on it, at least I am ready to. I am serious: any takers?<br>
    <br>
    I cannot believe that this present process claims representativity
    of a global public process, and as asserting global public interest,
    when it is clearly so selective about what issue it would spend its
    attention so disproportionately on and which voices and arguments
    fall on completely deaf ears.<br>
    <br>
    parminder<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAK2bTy-psD6vMdrKve0Wq7tsapXP7oWypwaACRFWO1EwfEEBuA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Would they become a windfall to the PTI? Or would they move
          by contract or some other instrument to the new IANA Functions
          Operator?</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>intrigued,</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Jordan</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On 3 June 2015 at 17:19, Alan Greenberg
          <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>&gt;</span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">As
            discussed during today's meeting, I would like to formally
            suggest that the CCWG propose that Upon the creation of PTI,
            ICANN will provide the equivalent of three years funding to
            PTI (both operational and R%D), and that PTI should hold
            these funds in escrow to cover any future situation where
            ICANN is not in a position to adequately find approved PTI
            budgets (the wording will clearly need to be refined).
            Furthermore, the amount provided by ICANN and held in escrow
            should be adjusted annually based on the then-current budget
            levels.<br>
            <br>
            There may need to be some adjustment of this to cover
            interest earned on the escrow funds, but I suspect there are
            standard business terms that cover this sort of thing.<br>
            <br>
            Alan<br>
            <br>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org"
              target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
            <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
              target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
        <br clear="all">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        -- <br>
        <div class="gmail_signature">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div>
              <div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br>
                <br>
                Chief Executive <br>
                <b>InternetNZ</b><br>
                <br>
                04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br>
                <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>
                <br>
                Skype: jordancarter<br>
                <br>
                <i>A better world through a better Internet </i><br>
                <br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>