<div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Leon,</div><div>Thank you very much for reply .But this is inconsistent with the objectives of work stream 1; " ACCOUNTABILITY TO BE IN PLACE OR COMMITTED BEFORE TRANSITION RTAKES PLACE " PARAMETERS/Protocols and Numbers are integral parts of INANA FUNCTIONS the stewardship of which is subject to transition?<br>Why the accountability of these two aspects of transition is outside the mandate of CCWG.. If so Under whose mandate these accountabilty fall? Could I have the views of our legal adviser pls ?</div><div>Kavouss </div><div>With my best regards</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2015-06-09 2:33 GMT+02:00 León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx" target="_blank">leonfelipe@sanchez.mx</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style>Dear Kavouss,<div><br></div><div>Thank you for pointing this issue out. As per our Charter, IETF and CRISP related issues fall out of the CCWG’s scope. I quote the relevant part in our Charter:</div><div><br></div><div>
<span lang="EN-US" style="background:white;color:rgb(1,1,1);line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt">Other groups’ (i.e. the
numbers and protocol parameters communities, as outlined in the ICG </span><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt"><a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rfp-iana-stewardship-08sep14-en.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="background:white">Request for Proposals</span></a></span><span lang="EN-US" style="background:white;color:rgb(1,1,1);line-height:115%;font-family:Calibri;font-size:11pt">)
proposals are intended to cover accountability issues related to the IANA
Stewardship Transition, as well as issues already being considered by RIRs and
IETF communities related in their respective areas in their engagement with
ICANN. These issues are outside of scope of the CCWG-Accountability. The CCWG-Accountability
will communicate with these groups to ensure that the CCWG-Accountability does
not cover issues going beyond its scope.</span> <br><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>
<div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>León</div>
</div><div><div class="h5">
<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>El 08/06/2015, a las 16:04, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> escribió:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear Co-Chairs </div><div>Our chater relating to work Stream 1 indicates / referred to the accountability which must be in place or committed before transition takes place.</div><div>In CCWG ,to gether with / inconsultation with CWG we have addressed accountability regarding Naming Community.</div><div>However, regardinfg Parameters / Protocol and Numbers accountability nothing is mentioned.</div><div>Accoring to IETF and CRISP they do not need any accountability ? WHICHIDOUBT</div><div>I draw your attention to the PART OF THE latest views of IETF regarding transition :</div><div>Quote</div><div><br></div><div><em>" The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC) has<br> decided to use an update of our yearly IETF-ICANN Service Level<br> Agreement (SLA) as the mechanism for this updated<br> agreement. They have drafted the update and from our<br> perspective it could be immediately executed. Once the updated<br> agreement is in place, the transition would be substantially<br> complete, with only the NTIA contract lapse or termination<br> as a final step</em>." </div><div>Unqiote</div><div>It seems to me neither IETF not RIREs wish to have any commuinity empowerment in their activities .Please look at their proposals to ICG dated 06 and 15 January 2015</div><div>On the other hand Parameters / Protocol and Numbers like Naming require accountability from those implementing them</div><div>My question to Lega Adviser is ,reading the proposals from IETF and RIREs to ICG, do they need to be accountable to the community or nor.We need to have a clwear advice on this</div><div>Regards </div><div>KAVOUSS </div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>