<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On Monday 15 June 2015 07:55 PM, Seun
Ojedeji wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD_dc6hRhiXPBbtyfQ5AvJt2MSUKn+wjhJKLTjU7=_pwASTPgw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">+1 to Avri. By the way, i am not sure so many still
insist on going the membership route. Maybe we need to check
that row call again. From the few comments to PC that i have
read i think those that supported membership route had quite a
number of "but"/reservations about it.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Membership route would most likely open up can of worms
that the community may not be prepared for. We create so much
firepower for ourselves and forget that its use may ultimately
affect us.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
There was a certain unclear 'us' in Avri's email, while I was still
pondering over it, I see Seun's email with a heavily reinforced
'us'... Who is this 'us', which it seems many here take for granted,
and have not questioned even. If there is a code word that I have
missed, I will like to enlightened. <br>
<br>
parminder <br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAD_dc6hRhiXPBbtyfQ5AvJt2MSUKn+wjhJKLTjU7=_pwASTPgw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>The more i think about the membership route within a
structure like ICANN, the more unrealistic it seem for it to
be efficient.</div>
<div><br>
<div>Regards</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Avri
Doria <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:avri@acm.org" target="_blank">avri@acm.org</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I agree with those who are argue that there is far greater
power in the<br>
Cooperative Model, aka Sidley's misnamed voluntary model, we
currently<br>
have than people are acknowledging. This is especially so
with the many<br>
improvements we have been discussing.<br>
<br>
As we have seen on occasion when enough of us work together,
the<br>
multistakeholder process can force the Board/Staff's hand.
I think<br>
people exagerate the power exercised by the NTIA and its
threat of<br>
contract non-renewal. Also remember that we will still
have a<br>
possible RFP event; the IANA Functions Review and the
Separation Cross<br>
Community WG can serve as the same forcing function if that
is the only<br>
sort of thing that convinces corporate ICANN.<br>
<br>
Not only will be able to use the combined stakeholder power
to force<br>
issues as we done before, we will still have the whole pro<br>
intergovernmental crowd waiting for us to fail so that they
save the day<br>
at the ITU or some other IGO. That should be enough to
inspire us. If<br>
it doesn't, I do not see how something dragging through the
courts for<br>
years will make much of a difference.<br>
<br>
As I have argued before, I think the whole membership route
offers first<br>
a set of delays while we try to agree on it with the Board,
and then<br>
allows for a new set of accountability holes we have yet to
fully<br>
explore or discover - my greatest concern. I believe we are
rushing<br>
into someting I think we just don't need for the transition.<br>
<br>
But if we go with a membership model as so many insist, I
believe that<br>
only one where the SO or AC is the UA should be considered.<br>
<br>
avri<br>
<span class=""><br>
<br>
On 15-Jun-15 03:03, Roelof Meijer wrote:<br>
> Keith,<br>
><br>
> I wonder if with "If a future ICANN Board were to
jump the tracks, the<br>
> community will no longer have the NTIA backstop.
Without legal<br>
> enforceability, the community would have to trust
future ICANN Boards<br>
> and trust future California Attorney Generals. “
you’re not<br>
> oversimplifying or over-contrasting between the
situation with legal<br>
> enforceability and without.<br>
><br>
> I think that in a situation where the board “jump the
track”, the<br>
> community ultimately goes through its process to
spill the board and<br>
> the board refuses to go, that board would be
paralyzed in all ways,<br>
> face shame and defamation individually on a global
scale and would<br>
> ruin their personal careers completely.<br>
> They would dimply not do that.<br>
><br>
> Best,<br>
><br>
> Roelof<br>
><br>
> From: <Drazek>, Keith Drazek <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a><br>
</span>> <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>>><br>
<span class="">> Date: zondag 14 juni 2015 03:52<br>
</span>> To: Chris Disspain <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>
<mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>><br>
> Cc: "<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>>"<br>
> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>
> <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>>><br>
<span class="">> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Acct-Legal]
Memo - Revised Powers Chart,<br>
> Voluntary Model<br>
><br>
> Chris,<br>
><br>
> NTIA's current enforcement powers are indirect but
very real. Through<br>
> its existing ability to re-bid the IANA Functions
contract, NTIA<br>
> ensures that ICANN and its Board of Directors remain
true to its<br>
> bylaws. That unique role is set to change.<br>
><br>
> If a future ICANN Board were to jump the tracks, the
community will no<br>
> longer have the NTIA backstop. Without legal
enforceability, the<br>
> community would have to trust future ICANN Boards and
trust future<br>
> California Attorney Generals. Why shouldn't we
instead trust the<br>
> global multi-stakeholder community itself?<br>
><br>
> If a future ICANN community were to try to spill the
board, wouldn't<br>
> we want that consensus decision to be legally
enforceable? Or do we<br>
> want to allow a future Board to tell the community it
was wrong and,<br>
> claiming fiduciary responsibility to the corporation,
reject the decision?<br>
><br>
> Ultimately, we're deciding whether authority should
rest with the<br>
> ICANN Board and the California AG, or with the ICANN
community and the<br>
> California AG.<br>
><br>
> I'm in favor of the latter.<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Keith<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Jun 13, 2015, at 6:08 PM, Chris Disspain <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a><br>
</span><span class="">> <mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>>
wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi Paul,<br>
>><br>
>> I was specifically responding to Keith’s point so
hardly a non-sequitur.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Cheers,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Chris<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>>> On 14 Jun 2015, at 02:29 , Paul Rosenzweig<br>
>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</a><br>
</span><span class="">>>> <mailto:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com">paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Chris<br>
>>><br>
>>> We need more formal powers for the community
because much of the<br>
>>> power of the NTIA was informal. The only
thing that could replace<br>
>>> the NTIA precisely would be the NTIA. I get
that you don't like the<br>
>>> membership model. But asking why a
non-governmental solution is<br>
>>> different from a governmental one is just a
non sequitur.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Paul<br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> Sent from myMail app for Android<br>
>>><br>
>>> Friday, 12 June 2015, 11:12PM -04:00 from
Chris Disspain<br>
</span>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>
<mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au">ceo@auda.org.au</a>>>:<br>
<span class="">>>><br>
>>> Greetings All,<br>
>>><br>
>>> 1. on Becky’s comment below: if that is
correct then surely the<br>
>>> same applies to the relationship between
the SO/AC and its<br>
>>> Unincorporated Association. If a court
cannot enforce a Board<br>
>>> spill by the SOs/ACs then a court can
also not make the UA do<br>
>>> what the SO or AC wants. Can it?<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2. on Keith’s comment below: How does the
NTIA currently have<br>
>>> powers of enforcement over ICANN outside
of matters covered in<br>
>>> the IANA contract? If NTIA was/is
prepared to enter into an<br>
>>> Affirmation of Commitment with ICANN
which can be terminated by<br>
>>> either party and is not legally
enforceable, why should we<br>
>>> insist on a higher standard?<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Cheers,<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> Chris<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>> On 13 Jun 2015, at 02:05 , Drazek,
Keith <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3akdrazek@verisign.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3akdrazek@verisign.com</a>>><br>
<span class="">>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Thanks Becky,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I think you highlight a key point.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Currently, NTIA and the California
Attorney General are the<br>
>>>> only enforcement bodies ensuring
ICANN remains committed to its<br>
>>>> bylaws.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The membership structure would give
some of that authority to<br>
>>>> the ICANN community through its
existing structures -- the SOs<br>
>>>> and ACs.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Isn’t that the definition of
transitioning the United States<br>
>>>> government (in its various forms) out
of its unique role?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> After NTIA disengages, don’t we want
the community to have<br>
>>>> shared authority for enforcement,
rather than leaving it to the<br>
>>>> California Attorney General alone?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Regards,<br>
>>>> Keith<br>
>>>><br>
</span>>>>> *From:* <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity%2dbounces@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity%2dbounces@icann.org</a>>
[mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity%2dbounces@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity%2dbounces@icann.org</a>>]
*On<br>
>>>> Behalf Of *Burr, Becky<br>
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2015 11:07 AM<br>
>>>> *To:* Roelof Meijer; Accountability
Cross Community<br>
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] FW:
[Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised<br>
<span class="">>>>> Powers Chart, Voluntary
Model<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Roelof,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> shi<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> As I understand it, Courts view the
bylaws as a contract<br>
>>>> between a corporation and its
members/shareholders. If ICANN<br>
>>>> has no members, the bylaws are not a
contract with anyone, so<br>
>>>> the only party with authority to
enforce would be the Attorney<br>
>>>> General. (As discussed elsewhere,
this is extremely unlikely<br>
>>>> to happen outside of a
fraud/corruption situation.)<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The fact that members of SO’s are
legal entities doesn’t change<br>
>>>> this. Unless they are members of
ICANN, they are not a party<br>
>>>> to the bylaws “contract.”<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> B<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> J. Beckwith Burr<br>
>>>><br>
</span>>>>> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General
Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer<br>
<span class="">>>>><br>
>>>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20006<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Office: +<br>
>>>> 1.202.533.2932 Mobile: <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="tel:%2B1.202.352.6367"
value="+12023526367">+1.202.352.6367</a> / <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3abecky.burr@neustar.biz"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3abecky.burr@neustar.biz</a>>
/ <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.neustar.biz"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.neustar.biz</a><br>
>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.neustar.biz/" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.neustar.biz/</a>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> *From: *Roelof Meijer <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aRoelof.Meijer@sidn.nl"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aRoelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>>><br>
>>>> *Date: *Friday, June 12, 2015 at 8:18
AM<br>
>>>> *To: *Accountability Community<br>
>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aaccountability%2dcross%2dcommunity@icann.org</a>>><br>
>>>> *Subject: *[CCWG-ACCT] FW: [Acct-Legal]
Memo - Revised Powers<br>
<div>
<div class="h5">>>>> Chart, Voluntary
Model<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Dear all, and especially dear legal
colleagues,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> The memo states:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> "If there were a dispute between
ICANN and an SO/AC, the<br>
>>>> parties could agree to an IRP and
binding arbitration, but<br>
>>>> there would be no mechanism to
restrain ICANN from acting<br>
>>>> contrary to these decisions, nor
would there be a mechanism to<br>
>>>> challenge an arbitration decision
that exceeded the scope of<br>
>>>> authority of the arbitration panel,
outside an unlikely,<br>
>>>> independent intervention by the
California Attorney General. "<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I understand that the SO/AC’s, not
being legal entities, cannot<br>
>>>> take legal action to enforce.
However, does that really equal<br>
>>>> "no mechanism to restrain ICANN
from acting contrary to these<br>
>>>> decisions”?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Most members of SO’s are legal
entities, many members of AC’s<br>
>>>> are too, couldn’t those members,
being affected parties,<br>
>>>> individually or collectively take
legal action?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Alternatively, I would assume that
before the ultimate step of<br>
>>>> talking legal action against ICANN,
the community will have<br>
>>>> escalated through its powers and
thus has completed the<br>
>>>> procedure to recall the entire
board. The power to recall the<br>
>>>> entire board will have to be
combined with the power to in one<br>
>>>> way or another appoint an interim
board. So, the community,<br>
>>>> through due process, recalls the
board. The board, in<br>
>>>> contradiction with the bylaws,
refuses “to go”. The community<br>
>>>> has recalled the board and thus,
through the defined process<br>
>>>> (also in the bylaws), appoints an
interim board. According to<br>
>>>> the bylaws, this interim board is
now the legal representative<br>
>>>> of ICANN. And can take the required
legal action (if necessary)<br>
>>>> to force the “old” board to go away
and get lost.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Would one of these two work?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Best,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Roelof Meijer<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
</div>
</div>
>>>> *From: *<Hofheimer>, "Joshua T."
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com">jhofheimer@sidley.com</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3ajhofheimer@sidley.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3ajhofheimer@sidley.com</a>>><br>
>>>> *Date: *donderdag 11 juni 2015 06:09<br>
>>>> *To: *"<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org">ccwg-accountability5@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org</a>>"<br>
>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org">ccwg-accountability5@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org</a>>><br>
<span class="">>>>> *Cc: *Sidley ICANN CCWG
<<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com">sidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asidleyicannccwg@sidley.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3asidleyicannccwg@sidley.com</a>>>,<br>
>>>> ICANN-Adler <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:ICANN@adlercolvin.com">ICANN@adlercolvin.com</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aICANN@adlercolvin.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aICANN@adlercolvin.com</a>>><br>
>>>> *Subject: *[Acct-Legal] Memo - Revised
Powers Chart, Voluntary<br>
<span class="">>>>> Model<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Dear Legal Sub-Team,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Further to the CCWG request on the
call last Friday, attached<br>
>>>> is a memo revising the summary chart
describing the viability<br>
>>>> of the enumerated powers under the
three models – Member model,<br>
>>>> Designator Model and Voluntary
Model. We also explore the<br>
>>>> impact of not having the SO/ACs
organized legal persons to<br>
>>>> represent their interests.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Cheers,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Josh<br>
>>>><br>
</span>>>>> *JOSHUA* *HOFHEIMER *<br>
<span class="">>>>><br>
>>>> Sidley Austin LLP<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1.213.896.6061" value="+12138966061">+1.213.896.6061</a>
(LA direct)<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1.650.565.7561" value="+16505657561">+1.650.565.7561</a>
(PA direct)<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1.323.708.2405" value="+13237082405">+1.323.708.2405</a>
(cell)<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jhofheimer@sidley.com">jhofheimer@sidley.com</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3ajhofheimer@sidley.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3ajhofheimer@sidley.com</a>><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.sidley.com</a><br>
<span class="">>>>> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e="
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e=</a>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png</a><br>
>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e="
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e=</a>>
*SIDLEY<br>
>>>> AUSTIN LLP*<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> *From:*<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org">ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5%2dbounces@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5%2dbounces@icann.org</a>>
[mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org">ccwg-accountability5-bounces@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5%2dbounces@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5%2dbounces@icann.org</a>>]
*On<br>
>>>> Behalf Of *Hilton, Tyler<br>
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, June 08, 2015 8:29 PM<br>
>>>> *To:* <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ccwg-accountability5@icann.org">ccwg-accountability5@icann.org</a><br>
>>>> <x-msg://<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3accwg%2daccountability5@icann.org</a>><br>
>>>> *Subject:* [Acct-Legal] Memo -
Responses to CCWG GAC Questions<br>
<span class="">>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Dear Legal Sub-team,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Attached please find a memo
responding to the list of questions<br>
>>>> from the Governmental Advisory
Committee (GAC) provided to us<br>
>>>> on June 5, 2015.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Best,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
</span>>>>> *TYLER* *HILTON*<br>
<span class="">>>>> Associate<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Sidley Austin LLP<br>
>>>> 555 West Fifth Street<br>
>>>> Los Angeles, CA 90013<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="tel:%2B1.213.896.6130" value="+12138966130">+1.213.896.6130</a><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:thilton@sidley.com">thilton@sidley.com</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3athilton@sidley.com"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3athilton@sidley.com</a>><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">http://www.sidley.com</a><br>
<span class="">>>>> <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=RZAttuK9gIR-rWhgnzzBCJwmd-AX6TvLB6W-cfwGyV4&e="
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=RZAttuK9gIR-rWhgnzzBCJwmd-AX6TvLB6W-cfwGyV4&e=</a>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.sidley.com/files/upload/signatures/SA-autosig.png</a><br>
>>>> <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e="
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=AwMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=QOhQjQwFElYq1-xAGs6TVUWxpVd3OZaCVRq9bV-0pUg&s=8g0nj7XBKequ4xTeqTLzy3EvyRZsOpZlGqNG7PIfFS4&e=</a>>
*SIDLEY<br>
>>>> AUSTIN LLP*<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
</span><span class="">>>>>
****************************************************************************************************<br>
>>>> This e-mail is sent by a law firm and
may contain information<br>
>>>> that is privileged or confidential.<br>
>>>> If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete the e-mail<br>
>>>> and any attachments and notify us<br>
>>>> immediately.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
****************************************************************************************************<br>
>>>><br>
>>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>>> Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list<br>
>>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
</span>>>>> <x-msg://<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aAccountability%2dCross%2dCommunity@icann.org"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">e-aj.my.com/compose/?mailto=mailto%3aAccountability%2dCross%2dCommunity@icann.org</a>><br>
<span class="">>>>> <a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>><br>
>>>
_______________________________________________<br>
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing
list<br>
>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
</span>>>> <x-msg://1/compose?To=<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability%252dCross%252dCommunity@icann.org">Accountability%2dCross%2dCommunity@icann.org</a>><br>
<span class="">>>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
</span>>> <mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span class="im HOEnZb">>> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br>
<br>
</span><span class="im HOEnZb">---<br>
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
software.<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.avast.com/antivirus" rel="noreferrer"
target="_blank">https://www.avast.com/antivirus</a><br>
<br>
</span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
-- <br>
<div class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<font color="#888888">
<blockquote style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex;font-family:garamond,serif">
<i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Seun Ojedeji,<br
style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">
</span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Federal
University Oye-Ekiti<br style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">
</span><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">web: </span><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.fuoye.edu.ng" target="_blank">http://www.fuoye.edu.ng</a><br>
<span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><span
style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">Mobile: <a
moz-do-not-send="true" value="+2348035233535">+2348035233535</a></span><span
style="color:rgb(0,102,0)"></span><br>
</i><i><span style="color:rgb(0,102,0)">alt email:<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://goog_1872880453" target="_blank"> </a><a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng"
target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng</a></span></i><br>
<br>
<blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The key to
understanding is humility - my view !<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</font><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>