<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>That’s important information Roelof. My understanding – which could of course be wrong – is that the CWG contingency requires “enforceable” budget authority but if that is not correct we should definitely correct the record.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I understand your point on the resignation authority as adequate for enforcement. Personally, I view that as a nuclear and very disruptive authority. Also personally speaking, in my experience, nuclear options tend to generate mutual assured destruction
responses. That means the option is really no longer effective. So, I personally place no stock in the spill the board authority. I would strongly prefer to have authorities that can actually be exercised, and the budget/strat plan powers seem both very
fundamental and much less catastrophic. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">J. Beckwith Burr<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Neustar, Inc. /</span></b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> Deputy
General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Office</span><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">: + 1.202.533.2932 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); "> Mobile</span>:
+1.202.352.6367 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); ">/ <a href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz" style="color: purple; ">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a> / www.neustar.biz</span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Roelof Meijer <<a href="mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl">Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, June 24, 2015 at 4:07 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Becky Burr <<a href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a>>, Accountability Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] revised deck<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;">
<div>
<div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
Becky, all,</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<br>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
I am aware that I risk beginning to sound like an old record.</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<br>
</div>
<div><font face="Calibri,sans-serif">But the phrase: "</font><font color="#292834" face="Arial"><i>the designator approach does not deliver full authority on budget and therefore jeopardize meeting CWG conditions.”
</i>needs clarification in my opinion. And possibly correction.</font></div>
<div><font color="#292834" face="Arial"><br>
</font></div>
<div><font color="#292834">Because with “full authority” I assume that you mean legal enforceability. Many might not understand that.</font></div>
<div><font color="#292834">Additionaly, I am unsure if the CWG conditions go as far as to specify that the community’s position on (or: veto of) the budget should (in itself) be legally enforceable. If however that is the case, I think it is a silly condition
that needs revision. Like I said this morning: if the community has to have it’s veto of the budget legally enforced, the disconnect between the board and the community is so complete, that the board would have to (be forced to) resign. So there’s no need
at all for a condition that the mechanism should deliver full authority on the budget.</font></div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Best,</font></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri"><br>
</font></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" face="Calibri">Roelof Meijer</font></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org">accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org</a>> on behalf of Becky Burr <<a href="mailto:Becky.Burr@neustar.biz">Becky.Burr@neustar.biz</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>woensdag 24 juni 2015 14:44<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>CCWG Accountability <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>[CCWG-ACCT] revised deck<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>I have modified the Empowered SO/SC Model deck to reflect some of the issues that have come up in our discussions since Friday. Please don’t be concerned if it does not reflect an issue of particular concern to you - this is still very much a discussion
draft. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">J. Beckwith Burr<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Neustar, Inc. /</span></b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> Deputy
General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Office</span><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">: + 1.202.533.2932 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); "> Mobile</span>:
+1.202.352.6367 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); ">/ <a href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz" style="color: purple; ">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a> / www.neustar.biz</span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><Burr>, Becky Burr <<a href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 5:32 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Keith Drazek <<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>>, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:directors@omadhina.net">directors@omadhina.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:directors@omadhina.net">directors@omadhina.net</a>>, Accountability Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] A question about WS1 v WS2<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>To amplify on Keith’s point – we must get it done right, and in a timely fashion. I see both as mandatory criteria. Neither objective should – or need be – sacrificed in the name of the other. We have a window of opportunity that may close, at least
for some period of time, as 2016 progresses.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">J. Beckwith Burr<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Neustar, Inc. /</span></b><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;"> Deputy
General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 11pt; "><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: rgb(6, 134, 88);">Office</span><span style="font-size: 9pt; font-family: Arial, sans-serif;">: + 1.202.533.2932 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); "> Mobile</span>:
+1.202.352.6367 <span style="color: rgb(6, 134, 88); ">/ <a href="mailto:becky.burr@neustar.biz" style="color: purple; ">becky.burr@neustar.biz</a> / www.neustar.biz</span></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span><Drazek>, Keith Drazek <<a href="mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com">kdrazek@verisign.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Monday, June 22, 2015 at 11:43 PM<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>"<a href="mailto:directors@omadhina.net">directors@omadhina.net</a>" <<a href="mailto:directors@omadhina.net">directors@omadhina.net</a>>, Accountability Community <<a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a>><br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [CCWG-ACCT] A question about WS1 v WS2<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="auto">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you Kavouss and Jonathan and Jordan. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We need to get our work done correctly AND in a timely manner to enable a successful transition. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I believe we can do both. They are not mutually exclusive.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">That is precisely why we agreed to bifurcate our work into WS-1 and WS-2.</span></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>Keith</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</div>
<div><br>
On Jun 22, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Agree with Jonathan
<div>We must concentrate on priority actions </div>
<div>Pls do not involve us in something which is not pressing . We have littlke time</div>
<div>We do not want to spent hours and hours on these like those hours that we wasted on UA.</div>
<div>We were misled and we do not want to do it again</div>
<div>The working method and priorities must be identified and decided at the level of the main group and not at the level of working parties</div>
<div>Regards</div>
<div>Kavouss </div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">2015-06-23 0:23 GMT+02:00 Barrack Otieno <span dir="ltr">
<<a href="mailto:otieno.barrack@gmail.com" target="_blank">otieno.barrack@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Hi Colleagues,<br>
<br>
In agreement with Dr. Lisse, we need to get it right nonetheless the<br>
essence of strategy is choosing what not to do. (Michael Porter)<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
On 6/23/15, Dr Eberhard W Lisse <<a href="mailto:el@lisse.na">el@lisse.na</a>> wrote:<br>
> Dear Co-Chairs,<br>
><br>
> he's wrong. As usual.<br>
><br>
> We need to get it right. Not get it done.<br>
><br>
> Never mind that Strickling has pronounced himself very clearly and<br>
> repeatedly.<br>
><br>
> el<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini<br>
><br>
>> On Jun 22, 2015, at 17:24, Jonathan Zuck <<a href="mailto:JZuck@actonline.org">JZuck@actonline.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I certainly agree with your interpretation, Jordan. The pressing nature of<br>
>> the transition dictates we limit our function to empowering the community<br>
>> and not trying to solve every challenge of ICANN accountability. There’s a<br>
>> great deal that can and should be done to improve the accountability of<br>
>> the organization as a whole including operational improvements and<br>
>> metrics, facilitating periodic participation in policy development and<br>
>> greater use of data in policy development as well as establishing a<br>
>> culture of continuous improvement (working on those two!).<br>
>><br>
>> But we can't do that in WS1<br>
>><br>
>> Jonathan Zuck<br>
>> President<br>
>> ACT: The App Association<br>
>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__Www.ACTonline.org&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=bUvwXc-OhZpubppydzO11hdbQulw89NTJxF-PfVf0MA&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
http://Www.ACTonline.org</a><br>
>><br>
>> From: Jordan Carter<br>
>> Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 5:19 PM<br>
>> To: Accountability CCWG<br>
>><br>
>> Hi all<br>
>><br>
>> I had the dubious pleasure of reading a post by one of our participants<br>
>> which got me thinking a range of things[1].. some of them constructive<br>
>> :-)<br>
>><br>
>> One is something I wanted to test others' views on.<br>
>><br>
>> Both in Kieran's piece and in the other feedback from various<br>
>> conversations and comments, there's a clear current of both<br>
>> staff/management accountability and ICANN entities/organisations<br>
>> accountability as needing work.<br>
>><br>
>> Now, I agree with that - I think the openness of this ICANN system is very<br>
>> poor, due to many things - the ridiculous time demands it makes on people<br>
>> to understand how it works (something none of our proposals materially<br>
>> complicates), the density and extent of the information, the rushed pace<br>
>> of many discussions, the ICANN way of doing multiple things at once, etc<br>
>> etc.<br>
>><br>
>> I also think the culture across the organisation is relatively inwardly<br>
>> focused... and that the Board has a job to do in building a culture and<br>
>> practice of accountability and community engagement in parts of the staff.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> But those are the views of an insider/outsider: someone whose job links<br>
>> him to this ICANN system, but who has only (!) attended six meetings of<br>
>> ICANN. Others of you will have different perspectives.<br>
>><br>
>> To the crux of my point: while I would really like us to tackle all the<br>
>> above, we face an imperative to not hold up the transition. I think we<br>
>> have been clear about that from the beginning, which was delayed from when<br>
>> it should have happened due to some of the factors I note above.<br>
>><br>
>> So: my interpretation has always been as follows:<br>
>><br>
>> Making ICANN's operations more generally accountable, and the whole<br>
>> organisation more outward looking and open, is very important - but our<br>
>> job in WorkStream 1 has been to put in place the structural features of a<br>
>> new accountability settlement that will give us the chance to achieve that<br>
>> in WorkStream 2.<br>
>><br>
>> To put it another way: we have to constrain ourselves to building the<br>
>> levers in this WS1 process that will allow the broader changes to approach<br>
>> that are needed and will be on the table in WS2, and then the first of the<br>
>> new ATRT reviews.<br>
>><br>
>> Do you share this understanding of why we have limited our focus?<br>
>><br>
>> Interested in people's thoughts on this. Want to know if I am out on a<br>
>> limb!<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> thanks<br>
>> Jordan<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> [1]:<br>
>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.theregister.co.uk_2015_06_18_us-5Fgovernment-5Fstages-5Fanother-5Fiana-5Fintervention_&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=2bk70Iq5_dRKLoZt9BmoYY_NBZtKtMdyJE6s0--YbHA&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/06/18/us_government_stages_another_iana_intervention/</a><br>
>><br>
>> --<br>
>> Jordan Carter<br>
>><br>
>> Chief Executive<br>
>> InternetNZ<br>
>><br>
>> 04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br>
>> <a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a><br>
>> Skype: jordancarter<br>
>><br>
>> A better world through a better Internet<br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
>> <a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=Pe9tu0pnD17K5BGGj7pDKppi9mUP8B5DJtBkiTibuNc&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Barrack O. Otieno<br>
+254721325277<br>
+254-20-2498789<br>
Skype: barrack.otieno<br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.otienobarrack.me.ke_&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=Ha44cyxoSamFIEvy1jfupBPCNoyxwverojEus8LiS5Y&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.otienobarrack.me.ke/</a><br>
</font></span>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=Pe9tu0pnD17K5BGGj7pDKppi9mUP8B5DJtBkiTibuNc&e=" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a></span><br>
<span><a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_accountability-2Dcross-2Dcommunity&d=AwMF_g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=lYaanM0LtSkNzSSPuIrVvnPTHZ729G7_pp66_aXJ1Ik&s=Pe9tu0pnD17K5BGGj7pDKppi9mUP8B5DJtBkiTibuNc&e=">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></span><br>
<span></span><br>
<span></span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</span></div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>