<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'; font-size: 13px; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Malcolm appear to.<br class=""><div class="">
  <style type="text/css" class="">
    p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px}
    p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Verdana; color: #9443fb}
    p.p3 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Verdana; color: #9443fb; min-height: 16.0px}
  </style>
<p class="p1"><br class=""></p>
<p class="p1"><br class=""></p>
<p class="p2">Cheers,</p>
<p class="p3"><br class=""></p>
<p class="p2">Chris</p>


</div>
<br class=""><div style=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 7 Jul 2015, at 22:30 , Jordan Carter &lt;<a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" class="">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">hi Chris<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I don't understand how your comment relates to Malcolm's?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">cheers</div><div class="">Jordan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 July 2015 at 00:21, Chris Disspain <span dir="ltr" class="">&lt;<a href="mailto:ceo@auda.org.au" target="_blank" class="">ceo@auda.org.au</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word" class=""><span style="font-family:'Verdana';font-size:13px;color:rgb(102,102,102)" class="">Hello Malcolm,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">I’m afraid&nbsp;I disagree with your interpretation. An intransigent position that does not countenance the possibility of movement away from or towards various solutions is a guarantee of failure when it comes to reaching consensus.<br class=""><div class=""><p class=""><br class=""></p><p class=""><br class=""></p><p class="">Cheers,</p><p class=""><br class=""></p><p class="">Chris</p>


</div><div class=""><div class="h5">
<br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 7 Jul 2015, at 22:16 , Malcolm Hutty &lt;<a href="mailto:malcolm@linx.net" target="_blank" class="">malcolm@linx.net</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br class=""><div class=""><br class="">On 07/07/2015 13:02, Kimberly Carlson wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">Here are today’s slides in both PowerPoint and PDF formats.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">On slide 2, "Overview", it says<br class=""><br class="">"The two new models seek to address concerns expressed by members of the<br class="">multi-stakeholder community on the Community Empowerment Mechanism<br class="">described in Section 5 of CCWG’s Accountability Initial Draft Proposal<br class="">for Public Comment (4 May 2015) (“Initial Proposal”)"<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">I'm afraid that this suggests that once again the lawyers have been<br class="">asked to examine the wrong question.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">The issue we must consider is not merely which of these two models will<br class="">best deliver on Section 5 of the CCWG's proposal, the community powers,<br class="">but which will best deliver *all* of it.<br class=""><br class="">Section 3 ("Principles") and Section 4 ("Appeals Mechanisms") are<br class="">essential elements of the CCWG proposal. So the lawyer's ought to have<br class="">been asked to consider how the two models differ in their effects on<br class="">those two sections too.<br class=""><br class="">As it happens, there is a passing mention of disparate effect: on slide<br class="">16 "Empowered SO/AC Designator Model" under "Problems/Complications" it<br class="">states "SOs and ACs would not have the reserved powers of members to<br class="">reverse board decisions like [...] implementing IRP recommendations."<br class=""><br class="">However this crucial distinction has been given very little visibility<br class="">of emphasis, I think as a result of concentrating only on Section 5, to<br class="">the exclusion of Sections 3 &amp; 4.<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">-- <br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Malcolm Hutty | tel: <a href="tel:%2B44%2020%207645%203523" value="+442076453523" target="_blank" class="">+44 20 7645 3523</a><br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog<br class=""> London Internet Exchange | <a href="http://publicaffairs.linx.net/" target="_blank" class="">http://publicaffairs.linx.net/</a><br class=""><br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;London Internet Exchange Ltd<br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY<br class=""><br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Company Registered in England No. 3137929<br class=""> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank" class="">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank" class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></div></div></span></div><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" class="">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br class="">
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" class="">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""><br clear="all" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div>-- <br class=""><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class="">Jordan Carter<br class=""><br class="">Chief Executive <br class=""><b class="">InternetNZ</b><br class=""><br class="">04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br class=""><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank" class="">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a> <br class="">Skype: jordancarter<br class=""><br class=""><i class="">A better world through a better Internet&nbsp;</i><br class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></span></body></html>