<div dir="ltr">Hi all<div><br></div><div>We also agreed we would discuss the updated Fundamental Bylaws part of the proposal by email. Please find the paper attached.</div><div><br></div><div>The changes are not significant but there is commentary on one significant issue.</div><div><br></div><div>- WP1 made a call to NOT include the locational requirements in the Articles or Bylaws as "Fundamental" - they would still be protected in the bylaws and Articles, and would be subject to the Standard Bylaws veto if a proposal to change that was ever made.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Other points:</div><div><br></div><div>- there is text to explain this more clearly, based on feedback in the comments and at meetings</div><div><br></div><div>- clarified (but may be too far) that the Separation review and PTI would be Fundamental Bylaws, as well as the CSC and IFR. (I think we need to take these back out.)</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Please read, discuss, etc.<br clear="all"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>cheers</div><div>Jordan</div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr">Jordan Carter<br><br>Chief Executive <br><b>InternetNZ</b><br><br>04 495 2118 (office) | +64 21 442 649 (mob)<br><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a> <br>Skype: jordancarter<br><br><i>A better world through a better Internet </i><br><br></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>