<div dir="ltr">Dear Jonathan, Lise, Sharon<div><br></div><div>On the CCWG-Accountability call today, we discussed the fundamental bylaws paper and the relationship with the requirements of the CWG-Stewardship's proposal.</div><div><br></div><div>There has been some discussion as to whether we should reference the PTI structure, and the Separation review, alongside the CSC and the IANA Functions Review in our Second Public Comment Report.</div><div><br></div><div>The last two items have been in the draft for a while. The first two have come in and out and as you can see from the <b>attached</b>, are currently out.</div><div><br></div><div>We are relaxed I think about including them or not including them but seek your formal guidance on the question -- and if you have any, specific guidance as to the right way to reference if they are included.<br clear="all"><div><br></div><div>I'd appreciate your feedback by close of play Wednesday UTC if possible so we can resolve this on the CCWG-Accountability's next call on Thursday 23rd.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Many thanks,</div><div><br></div><div>Jordan Carter</div><div>Rapporteur, Work Party 1 (Community Empowerment)</div><div>CCWG-Accountability</div><div><br></div>--
</div></div>