<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I suggest we say NomCom shall not put up less than two.&nbsp;<br><br>That should give enough flexibility to cover all wishes that were brought forward.</div><div><br></div><div>Thomas<br><br><div><span style="font-size: 13pt;">========</span></div><div><a href="http://rickert.net">rickert.net</a></div><div><br></div><div>PS -&nbsp;<span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Sent from my cell.&nbsp;Please excuse typos and brevity.</span></div></div><div><br>Am 23.07.2015 um 20:41 schrieb Greg Shatan &lt;<a href="mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com">gregshatanipc@gmail.com</a>&gt;:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think this point has moved on a bit, based on the call earlier today.&nbsp; The NomCom will not be putting up alternates.&nbsp; I believe where we are now is that the NomCom will (in the event of a spill) put up at least two and possibly up to eight interim directors at that time.&nbsp; I'm not sure but they may have the option of not putting up directors at all, but I think that did not come out on top in the call.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">NomCom gets more good candidates than they nominate, so there is a pool from which to draw on, should the time ever come.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I think this is right or close to it, but the next draft should clear this up.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Seun Ojedeji <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:seun.ojedeji@gmail.com" target="_blank">seun.ojedeji@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">I agree with this as well, although I thought there was clear direction on this subject in Paris.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Regards</p>
<p dir="ltr">Sent from Google nexus 4<br>
kindly excuse brevity and typos.</p><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On 23 Jul 2015 7:23 pm, "Cherine Chalaby" &lt;<a href="mailto:cherine.chalaby@icann.org" target="_blank">cherine.chalaby@icann.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">I agree. It does not make sense to ask NomCom to nominate alternates. &nbsp; Cherine<br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 23 Jul 2015, at 15:23, Marilyn Cade &lt;<a href="mailto:marilynscade@hotmail.com" target="_blank">marilynscade@hotmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px">I agree with not asking the NomCom to put up alternates. Spilling the Board should be so exceptional and a smaller exe board should be able to then launch a process, which could result in both elections and in appointments.<div>M<br><br><div>&gt; Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:13:13 +0100<br>&gt; From:<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:malcolm@linx.net" target="_blank">malcolm@linx.net</a><br>&gt; To:<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:jordan@internetnz.net.nz" target="_blank">jordan@internetnz.net.nz</a>;<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:wp1@icann.org" target="_blank">wp1@icann.org</a>;<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org" target="_blank">accountability-cross-community@icann.org</a><br>&gt; Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [WP1] updated paper: Recall of the ICANN Board<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; On 23/07/2015 11:18, Jordan Carter wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; See my edits in the files beginning with 2015-07-23.<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; One comment: I thought the general view in Paris was that NomCom would<br>&gt; not nominate members of an interim Board. I doubt the practicality of<br>&gt; requiring it to do so.<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; That seems to have changed; perhaps I missed some discussion. Or<br>&gt; misperceived the general view.<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; Requiring NomCom to put up alternates at the AGM creates the "people<br>&gt; standing in the shadows waiting for a chance" that were mentioned as a<br>&gt; prospect to be avoided, and was accepted as a reason for not requiring<br>&gt; SOs and ACs to nominate alternates with every appointment.<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; Moreover, how will NomCom find people willing to commit to drop<br>&gt; everything and become an interim director in the unlikely event of a<br>&gt; Board spill, knowing that it is highly unlikely this will ever come to<br>&gt; pass?<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; It is surely much easier to ask someone "Will you agree to serve as a<br>&gt; director now?" than "Will you agree to serve as a director in an<br>&gt; unspecified number of months, should some very unlikely event come to<br>&gt; pass?".<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; For these reasons, I think that excusing NomCom from nominating interim<br>&gt; directors is a better choice.<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; --<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; Malcolm Hutty | tel: <a href="tel:%2B44%2020%207645%203523" value="+442076453523" target="_blank">+44 20 7645 3523</a><br>&gt; Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog<br>&gt; London Internet Exchange |<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="http://publicaffairs.linx.net/" target="_blank">http://publicaffairs.linx.net/</a><br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; London Internet Exchange Ltd<br>&gt; 21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; Company Registered in England No. 3137929<br>&gt; Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><br>&gt; _______________________________________________<br>&gt; Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>&gt;<span>&nbsp;</span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br></div></div></div><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;float:none;display:inline!important">_______________________________________________</span><br style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;float:none;display:inline!important">Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list</span><br style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px"><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:16px;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a></div></blockquote></div><br></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org" target="_blank">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org">Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>WP1 mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:WP1@icann.org">WP1@icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>