<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I personally don't agree with the minimalist approach, though I agree with tring to avoid overreach.</div><div><br></div><div>My view is more like: "Whatever it takes to get it right"</div><div><br></div><div>And in the context of transparency it means full disclosure unless quite specifically permitted not to disclose. Not the other way around.</div><div><br></div><div>el<br><br>-- <span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); "></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13pt; -webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.294118); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.231373);">Sent from </span><span style="font-size: 13pt;">Dr Lisse's iPhone 6</span></div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Jul 24, 2015, at 08:54, Nigel Roberts <<a href="mailto:nigel@channelisles.net">nigel@channelisles.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>Why?</span><br><span></span><br><span>That's like saying let's keep legislative changes to the minumum. It MAY be appropriate, but it may not.</span><br><span></span><br><span>It's not an end in itself.</span><br><span></span><br><span>On 07/24/2015 07:44 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"><span>.. Let's try to keep bylaw changes to a minimum.</span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><span>Thomas</span></blockquote></div></blockquote><br></body></html>