<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Thank you Chris, that's very useful and I can understand. <br>
<br>
However that veto on the "extremely narrow band of global policies
for ccTLDs" would only be possible if the policy also implied a
Bylaw change. Did that ever happen or is that even conceivable ? IDN
ccTLD Fast track or Framework of Interpretation did not I believe. <br>
<br>
You have more experience than me on that. <br>
<br>
Best<br>
Mathieu<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 29/07/2015 14:38, Chris Disspain a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:FDE68BC9-C632-4A60-AC3A-BEE9526874F4@auda.org.au"
type="cite"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'; font-size: 13px;
color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">Well, here I am prepared to express
an opinion. The ccNSO policy by-law is clearly written and sets
out the basis upon which ccNSO policy can be dealt with by the
Board. There is a requirement for the ccNSO to involve the other
relevant ICANN bodies in its policy making. The idea that the
extremely narrow band of global policies for ccTLDs that may be
undertaken by the ccNSO in accordance with the carefully crafted
and politically balanced methodologies that have been created
could, in essence, be blocked by other SOs and ACs is totally
unacceptable to auDA and I suspect would be unacceptable to a
number of my ccTLD colleagues.</span></blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
*****************************
Mathieu WEILL
AFNIC - directeur général
Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:mathieu.weill@afnic.fr">mathieu.weill@afnic.fr</a>
Twitter : @mathieuweill
*****************************
</pre>
</body>
</html>